Infertility-related stress in men and women predicts treatment outcome 1 year later
Objective
To examine the separate and joint effects of male and female fertility problem (FP) stress and the source of stress (e.g., personal, social, marital) on treatment outcome.
Design
Prospective, epidemiological cohort design.
Setting
Fertility clinics in Denmark.
Patient(s)
Eight hundred eighteen couples who were about to begin a new course of treatment.
Intervention(s)
An FP stress inventory was administered at the start of treatment, and the treatment outcome was evaluated 12 months later.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Number of treatment cycles in 12-month study period and treatment outcome (i.e., success, no success).
Result(s)
Fertility problem stress was associated with a poorer treatment outcome in women (pooled within-groups [WGr] correlation,WGr = .517) and men (WGr = .392) with the effect significantly more pronounced for women (z = 3.19, P<.001). Fertility problem stress arising in the personal and marital domain showed greater associations with treatment outcome than did FP stress from the social domain. Logistic regression indicated that women who reported more marital distress required more treatment cycles to conceive (median 3) than women reporting less marital distress (median 2) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.20: Model χ2(3) = 77.21, P<.001).
Conclusion(s)
The findings provide evidence that infertility-related stress has direct and indirect effects on treatment outcome.
Key Words: Stress , psychology , psychosocial , reproduction , marital , gender , counselling , infertility , in vitro fertilization , fertility
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Supported by the Danish Health Insurance Fund (Jnr. 11/097-97), the Else and Mogens Wedell-Wedellsborgs Fund, the manager E. Danielsens and Wife’s Fund, the merchant L.F. Foghts Fund, and the Jacob Madsen and Wife Olga Madsens Fund.
PII: S0015-0282(05)00408-5
doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.039
© 2005 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

