Fertility and Sterility
Volume 87, Issue 3 , Pages 515-518, March 2007

Comparing intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization in patients with single oocyte retrieval

  • Itai Gozlan, B.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
  • ,
  • Alon Dor, B.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Brandeis University, School of Arts and Sciences, Waltham, Massachusetts
  • ,
  • Betty Farber, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • IVF Unit, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer,Israel, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Dror Meirow, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVF Unit, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer,Israel, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Shira Feinstein, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVF Unit, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer,Israel, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • ,
  • Jacob Levron, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVF Unit, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer,Israel, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Jacob Levron, M.D., IVF Unit, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel (FAX: 972-3-5341589).

Received 15 February 2006; received in revised form 31 July 2006; accepted 31 July 2006. published online 08 December 2006.

Objective

To compare the efficacy of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and conventional IVF in patients with favorable and poor sperm parameters in which only a single oocyte was available for insemination.

Design

Retrospective analysis.

Setting

University-affiliated IVF center.

Patient(s)

A total of 311 patients (425 cycles) who underwent either stimulated or spontaneous IVF cycles that resulted in single oocyte retrieval.

Intervention(s)

The ICSI was indicated when fertilization failure was anticipated because of sperm quality or other confounding female factors.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Fertilization rates and pregnancy rates (PRs) were analyzed according to the woman’s age (≤39 or >39 years), sperm quality, and mode of insemination.

Result(s)

In patients <39 years old with favorable semen quality, ICSI and standard insemination produced similar fertilization rates (67.1% vs. 75.0%) and PRs (0.0 vs. 8.2%). Conversely, in cases with apparent lower semen quality, ICSI gave a significantly higher fertilization rate (85.4% vs. 44.2%) but no significant difference in PRs (14.6% vs. 4.7%). In patients >39 years old and with favorable semen quality, ICSI and standard insemination produced similar fertilization rates (82.4% vs. 68.4%) and PRs (0.0 vs. 1.1%). The ICSI for lower semen quality, however, produced both higher fertilization rates (84.0% vs. 52%) and higher PRs (8.0% vs. 0).

Conclusion(s)

Our results suggest that in poorly responding patients, semen quality should remain the most important determinant when considering whether to perform ICSI. We have found that the values of 20 × 106/mL and 35% motility are good predictors of success in such patients.

Key Words: Poor responders, male infertility, ICSI

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0015-0282(06)04032-5

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1515

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 87, Issue 3 , Pages 515-518, March 2007