Fertility and Sterility
Volume 88, Issue 1 , Pages 74-81, July 2007

Changes in measured endometrial thickness predict in vitro fertilization success

  • Grant D.E. McWilliams, D.O.

      Affiliations

    • Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
  • ,
  • John L. Frattarelli, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Somerset, New Jersey
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: John L. Frattarelli, M.D, Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, 100 Franklin Square Drive, Suite 200, Somerset NJ 08873 (FAX: 732-537-0134).

Received 9 April 2006; received in revised form 17 November 2006; accepted 17 November 2006. published online 18 January 2007.

Objective

To assess the predictive ability of endometrial thickness and changes in endometrial thickness on pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing IVF.

Design

Retrospective cohort analysis.

Setting

Academic IVF center.

Patient(s)

Infertile patients undergoing 132 fresh autologous IVF cycles.

Intervention(s)

Transvaginal ultrasound to assess endometrial thickness at three defined points during IVF (after pituitary suppression, on the sixth day of gonadotropin stimulation, and on the day of hCG administration).

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Primary outcome variables included endometrial lining thickness at baseline, on day 6 of gonadotropins, the day of hCG administration, and the change in endometrial thickness during gonadotropin stimulation.

Result(s)

Patients attaining pregnancy had significantly greater endometrial thickness on day 6 and endometrial thickness on day of hCG administration. Pregnant patients had a greater change in endometrial thickness from the baseline to day 6 when compared to nonpregnant patients. Threshold analysis and receiver–operator characteristic curves noted significant endometrial thickness levels for implantation and pregnancy rates.

Conclusion(s)

Endometrial responsiveness and thickness during the early IVF stimulation seem to be better prognostic predictors of success than endometrial thickness at the start or the end of the IVF cycle.

Key Words: Infertility, endometrial thickness, endometrial growth, transvaginal ultrasound, pregnancy outcome, IVF, endometrium, implantation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by the Department of Clinical Investigation at Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI.

 The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the investigators, and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U. S. Government.

PII: S0015-0282(06)04546-8

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.089

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 88, Issue 1 , Pages 74-81, July 2007