Fertility and Sterility
Volume 88, Issue 3 , Pages 629-631, September 2007

Ectopic pregnancy rates with frozen compared with fresh blastocyst transfer

  • Sunny H. Jun, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
  • ,
  • Amin A. Milki, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Amin A. Milki, M.D., Stanford University Medical Center, 900 Welch Rd. Ste 350, Palo Alto, CA 94304 (FAX: 650-736-7036).

Received 24 May 2006; received in revised form 18 December 2006; accepted 22 December 2006. published online 16 April 2007.

Objective

To compare the rate of ectopic pregnancy (EP) with fresh versus frozen blastocyst transfer in our program during the same time period.

Design

Retrospective analysis.

Setting

University IVF program.

Patient(s)

Women who achieved a clinical pregnancy after IVF between 1998 and 2005.

Intervention(s)

In our program, cryopreservation is performed at the blastocyst stage. Embryo transfer was performed 1 to 1.5 cm short of the fundus by abdominal ultrasound guidance.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

The incidence of EP was examined in relation to fresh versus frozen blastocyst transfer.

Result(s)

In the frozen blastocyst group, there were 5 EPs out of 180 clinical pregnancies (2.8%), and there were 10 EPs out of 564 clinical pregnancies (1.8%) in the fresh blastocyst group.

Conclusion(s)

The rate of EP is not significantly increased after the transfer of frozen thawed blastocysts compared with fresh blastocyst transfer.

Key Words: Blastocyst, ectopic pregnancy, frozen transfer, in vitro fertilization

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0015-0282(07)00030-1

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.005

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 88, Issue 3 , Pages 629-631, September 2007