Journal Home
Search for

Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages 1787-1794 (June 2008)


View previous. 35 of 58 View next.

Follicular growth and estradiol follow-up after subcutaneous xenografting of fresh and cryopreserved human ovarian tissue

Benoit Schubert, M.D., Ph.D.adCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Michel Canis, M.D., Ph.D.be, Claude Darcha, M.D.c, Christine Artonne, B.S.d, Johan Smitz, M.D., Ph.D.f, Genevieve Grizard, Ph.D.ad

Received 4 October 2006; received in revised form 30 March 2007; accepted 30 March 2007. published online 20 August 2007.

Objective

To assess ovarian cortex surrounding benign ovarian cysts after cryopreservation and grafting to severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice.

Design

Animal study.

Setting

Academic research laboratories.

Patient(s)

Ovarian tissue obtained from 15 patients.

Intervention(s)

Grafting of fresh and frozen/thawed ovarian tissue into the subcutaneous space of 22 SCID mice for 80 days.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Histologic analysis before and after grafting. Serum E2 measured before (after 37 days of grafting) and after FSH/LH supplementation (end of the study).

Result(s)

After grafting, follicular density had decreased for frozen/thawed tissue in all cases. The follicular distribution was modified in fresh tissue: Primordial follicles proportion was reduced (79% vs. 17%), whereas the primary and secondary ones were increased (21% vs. 57% and 0% vs. 23%, respectively). The same tendency was observed in frozen/thawed tissue. Significant E2 secretion was obtained before and after FSH/LH supplementation in castrated mice, grafted with either fresh or frozen/thawed tissue.

Conclusion(s)

Fresh and cryopreserved ovarian cortex surrounding benign ovarian cysts grafted into the subcutaneous space of SCID mice is able to sustain ovarian tissue function, although follicular growth appears lower with frozen/thawed tissue.

a Department of Biology of Development and Reproduction–CECOS, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France

b Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Human Reproduction, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France

c Pathology Laboratory, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France

d Biology of Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, University Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France

e Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France

f RIA Laboratory, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academisch Ziekenhuis Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Benoit Schubert, M.D., Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Unitē fonctionelle de Biologie de la Reproduction, Pavillon Benjamin Delessert, 83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France (FAX: +33-1-42-17-78-89).

 This work was supported by a hospital grant (PHRC).

PII: S0015-0282(07)00998-3

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.101


View previous. 35 of 58 View next.