Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 5 , Pages 1848-1852, May 2009

Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and insulin resistance in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

  • Kathleen Brennan, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • ,
  • Andy Huang, M.D., M.B.A.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
  • ,
  • Ricardo Azziz, M.D., M.B.A., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
    • Department of Medicine, the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Ricardo Azziz, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A., Department of Ob/Gyn and Center for Androgen Related Disorders, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8635 West Third Street, Suite 160W, Los Angeles, CA 90048 (FAX: 310-423-3470).

Received 27 September 2007; received in revised form 4 February 2008; accepted 8 February 2008. published online 25 April 2008.

Objective

To test the hypothesis that increasing DHEAS levels is associated with improved insulin resistance in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

Design

Cross-sectional cohort analysis.

Setting

Academic medical center.

Patient(s)

Three hundred fifty-two women with PCOS.

Intervention(s)

Patients presenting for evaluation of symptoms related to androgen excess were evaluated physically and biochemically through laboratory analysis.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Circulating DHEAS, total T, free T, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) levels, and calculated homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR).

Result(s)

Bivariate analysis indicated that all parameters were associated with HOMA-IR, except 17-OHP and age, and confirmed a negative correlation between DHEAS and HOMA-IR. Multivariate analysis indicated that increases in DHEAS, SHBG, 17-OHP, and age were associated with decreasing HOMA-IR, whereas increases in free T, body mass index (BMI), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) were associated with increasing HOMA-IR. In decreasing order of importance, the following variables predicted insulin resistance: BMI > WHR > age > DHEAS > free T > SHBG > 17-OHP.

Conclusion(s)

DHEAS is negatively correlated to insulin resistance in patients with PCOS, and in our model ranked just behind other well-established predictors including BMI, WHR, and age. Whether this is due to a direct beneficial effect on insulin action by adrenal androgens such as DHEA, or whether DHEAS simply reflects the circulating levels of hyperinsulinemia, remains to be determined.

Key Words: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), DHEAS, insulin resistance, adrenal androgens

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 R. A. is a consultant for Merck & Co., Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, and Quest Diagnostics. K.B. has nothing to disclose. A.H. has nothing to disclose.

 Supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants R01-HD2364 and K24-HD01346-01, and the Helping Hand of Los Angeles, Inc., Los Angeles, California.

 Presented in part at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, New Orleans, LA, October 21–25, 2006.

PII: S0015-0282(08)00366-X

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.101

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 5 , Pages 1848-1852, May 2009