Fertility and Sterility
Volume 94, Issue 5 , Pages 1652-1656, October 2010

A nationwide survey of oncologists regarding treatment-related infertility and fertility preservation in female cancer patients

  • Eric J. Forman, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Eric J. Forman, M.D., Duke University Medical Center, Box 3616, Durham, NC. 27713 (FAX: 919-668-5547).
  • ,
  • Carey K. Anders, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Millie A. Behera, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Received 25 July 2009; received in revised form 24 September 2009; accepted 5 October 2009. published online 27 November 2009.

Objective

To survey oncologists regarding their knowledge and practice patterns concerning fertility preservation for female cancer patients.

Design

An online survey was sent to oncologists at cancer centers ranked by U.S. News & World Report.

Setting

Oncologists who treat women of reproductive age at academic medical centers.

Patient(s)

None.

Intervention(s)

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Counseling and referral practices of oncologists regarding fertility risks among young women with cancer.

Results

Most (95%) of the 249 responding oncologists routinely discuss a treatment's impact on fertility; 1,701 surveys were sent. Although 82% have referred patients to reproductive endocrinologists, more than half rarely refer. When planning treatment, 30% rarely consider a woman's desire for fertility. Gynecologic oncologists were more likely to routinely consider fertility compared with other oncologists (93% vs. 60%). Gynecologic oncologists also were more likely to provide a less effective regimen to better preserve fertility (61% vs. 37%). Most oncologists (86%) would be willing to sacrifice less than a 5% reduction in disease-free survival if a regimen offered better fertility outcomes; 36% felt patients would be willing to sacrifice >5%.

Conclusion(s)

Although most oncologists at academic medical centers discuss the risk of infertility with female patients, referrals to reproductive endocrinologists are rare. Gynecologic oncologists may be more likely than others to consider modifying treatment to preserve fertility. According to oncologists, patients may be willing to sacrifice more in survival than they would.

Key Words: Fertility preservation, oncofertility, survey, infertility, cancer, oncologists

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 E.J.F. has nothing to disclose. C.K.A. has nothing to disclose. M.A.B. is a speaker and investigator for Insightec.

PII: S0015-0282(09)03864-3

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.008

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 94, Issue 5 , Pages 1652-1656, October 2010