Fertility and Sterility
Volume 94, Issue 5 , Pages 1700-1706, October 2010

Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage

  • William B. Schoolcraft, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, Lone Tree, Colorado
  • ,
  • Elpida Fragouli, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oxford, United Kingdom
    • Reprogenetics UK, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • John Stevens, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, Lone Tree, Colorado
  • ,
  • Santiago Munne, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Reprogenetics, Livingston, New Jersey
  • ,
  • Mandy G. Katz-Jaffe, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Dagan Wells, Ph.D., F.R.C.Path.

      Affiliations

    • University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oxford, United Kingdom
    • Reprogenetics UK, Oxford, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Dr. Dagan Wells, Ph.D., F.R.C.Path., University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Women's Centre, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom (FAX: 01865-769141).

Received 25 July 2009; received in revised form 6 October 2009; accepted 7 October 2009. published online 24 November 2009.

Objective

To evaluate a new strategy for comprehensive chromosome screening at the blastocyst stage.

Design

Clinical research study.

Setting

An IVF clinic and a specialist preimplantation genetic diagnosis laboratory.

Patient(s)

Forty-five infertile couples participated in the study. The mean maternal age was 37.7 years, and most couples had at least one previous unsuccessful IVF treatment cycle (mean 2.4).

Intervention(s)

This study used a novel chromosome screening approach, combining biopsy of several trophectoderm cells on day 5 after fertilization and detailed analysis of all 24 types of chromosome using comparative genomic hybridization.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Proportion of embryos yielding a diagnostic result, aneuploidy rate, implantation rate, and pregnancy rate.

Result(s)

A diagnosis was obtained from 93.7% of embryos tested. The aneuploidy rate was 51.3%. The probability of an individual transferred embryo forming a pregnancy reaching the third trimester/birth was 68.9%, an implantation rate 50% higher than contemporary cycles from the same clinic. The pregnancy rate was 82.2%.

Conclusion(s)

The comprehensive chromosome screening method described overcomes many of the problems that limited earlier aneuploidy screening techniques and may finally allow preimplantation genetic screening to achieve the benefits predicted by theory. The high embryo implantation rate achieved is particularly encouraging and, if confirmed in subsequent studies, will be of great significance for IVF clinics attempting to reduce the number of embryos transferred or to implement single embryo transfer.

Key Words: Microarray, chromosome, aneuploidy, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, preimplantation genetic screening, single embryo transfer, implantation, in vitro fertilization

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 W.S. has nothing to disclose. E.F. has nothing to disclose. J.S. has nothing to disclose. S.M. has nothing to disclose. M.K.-J. has nothing to disclose. D.W. has nothing to disclose.

 The first two authors contributed equally to this work.

 Dr. Wells was funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Programme.

PII: S0015-0282(09)03875-8

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.015

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 94, Issue 5 , Pages 1700-1706, October 2010