Fertility and Sterility
Volume 74, Issue 5 , Pages 855-869, November 2000

Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine myomas

  • Bradley S Hurst, M.D. (a)

      Affiliations

    • Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Bradley S. Hurst, M.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, P.O. Box 32861, Charlotte, North Carolina 28232 (FAX: 704-355-1941 )
  • ,
  • Daniel J Stackhouse, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • Michelle L Matthews, M.D. (a)

      Affiliations

    • Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • Paul B Marshburn (M.D.a)

      Affiliations

    • Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA

Received 25 July 2000; received in revised form 25 July 2000; accepted 25 July 2000.

Abstract 

Objective: To evaluate the role of uterine artery embolization as treatment for symptomatic uterine myomas.

Design: Medline literature review, cross-reference of published data, and review of selected meeting abstracts.

Result(s): Results from clinical series have shown a consistent short-term reduction in uterine size, subjective improvement in uterine bleeding, and reduced pain following treatment. Posttreatment hospitalization and recovery tend to be shorter after uterine artery embolization compared with hysterectomy. Randomized controlled trials have not been conducted, and long-term efficacy has not been studied. A limited number of deliveries have been reported following uterine artery embolization for uterine myomas.

Conclusion(s): Uterine artery embolization is a unique new treatment for symptomatic uterine myomas. Even without controlled studies, demand for this procedure has increased rapidly. Uterine artery embolization may be considered an alternative to hysterectomy, or perhaps myomectomy, in well-selected cases. At the present time, however, uterine artery embolization should not be routinely recommended for women who desire future fertility.

Keywords:  Uterine artery embolization, uterine myomas, leiomyoma, hysterectomy, myomectomy, interventional radiology, menometrorrhagia, clinical studies

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0015-0282(00)01572-7

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 74, Issue 5 , Pages 855-869, November 2000