Fertility and Sterility
Volume 78, Issue 5 , Pages 1068-1072, November 2002

Minimal ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization using sequential clomiphene citrate and gonadotropin with or without the addition of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist

  • Shaun C Williams, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Shaun C. Williams, M.D., The Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, 601 Colley Avenue, Norfolk, Virginia 23507, USA (FAX: 757-446-8998)
  • ,
  • William E Gibbons, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • ,
  • Suheil J Muasher, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
  • ,
  • Sergio Oehninger, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA

Received 11 November 2000

Abstract 

Objective: To compare the results of a minimal-stimulation protocol with those of a standard protocol used for IVF.

Design: Retrospective, controlled study.

Setting: University center.

Patient(s): Fifty-five patients undergoing IVF using a minimal-stimulation protocol with or without adjuvant therapy with a GnRH antagonist. A control group consisted of age- and diagnosis-matched patients undergoing a standard long GnRH agonist (GnRH-a)-gonadotropin stimulation during the same time period.

Intervention(s): Clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins, with or without the GnRH antagonist ganirelix.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Oocytes recovered and pregnancy rates.

Result(s): The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly lower for the minimal-stimulation regimen compared with the case of the long GnRH-a protocol (4.8 ± 2.6 vs. 16.2 ± 7.5, respectively). The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer, however, was not significantly different between the two regimens (37% vs. 41%, minimal stimulation vs. long GnRH-a protocol, respectively). The addition of ganirelix resulted in at least the same pregnancy outcome as compared with the case of cycles without the antagonist.

Conclusion(s): Minimal stimulation using clomiphene citrate followed by gonadotropin for IVF results in pregnancy rates equal to the standard long GnRH-a-gonadotropin protocol. The addition of ganirelix resulted in at least similar results with the advantage of eliminating the occurrence of a premature endogenous LH surge.

Keywords:  GnRH antagonist, IVF, minimal stimulation, pregnancy rate

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0015-0282(02)03374-5

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 78, Issue 5 , Pages 1068-1072, November 2002