Journal Home
Search for

Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages 261-267 (February 2003)


View previous. 4 of 49 View next.

A randomized placebo-controlled study of the effect of transdermal vs. oral estradiol with or without gestodene on homocysteine levels

R.G.V Smolders, M.D.a, M.J van der Mooren, M.D., Ph.D.aCorresponding Author Informationemail address, T Teerlink, Ph.D.b, J.M.W.M Merkus, Ph.D.c, M.V.A.M Kroeks, Ph.D.d, H.R Franke, Ph.D.e, C.D.A Stehouwer, Ph.D.f, P Kenemans, Ph.D.a

Received 21 February 2002; received in revised form 10 June 2002; accepted 10 June 2002.

Abstract 

Objective

To assess the effect of transdermal vs. oral administration of E2 on plasma homocysteine levels and to evaluate the impact of adding a progestogen to these regimens.

Design

Prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study.

Setting

Outpatient clinics in two university hospitals and two teaching hospitals in The Netherlands.

Patient(s)

One hundred fifty-two healthy hysterectomized postmenopausal women.

Intervention(s)

Thirteen 28-day treatment cycles with placebo (n = 49); transdermal 17β-E2, 50 μg (n = 33), oral E2, 1 mg (n = 37), or oral E2, 1 mg, plus gestodene, 25 μg (n = 33), followed by four cycles of placebo in each group.

Main outcome measure(s)

Fasting plasma total homocysteine concentrations at baseline and cycle 4, 13, and 17.

Result(s)

Mean (±SD) homocysteine concentrations in the oral E2 group decreased from baseline to cycle 4 (9.0 ± 2.5 μmol/L vs. 8.2 ± 2.0 μmol/L; mean change, −7.6%). Homocystine values in the oral E2 plus gestodene group did not change substantially from baseline to cycle 4 (8.9 ± 1.6 μmol/L vs. 8.6 ± 2.0 μmol/L; mean change, −4.4%). No significant changes were observed in the transdermal E2 group. After four washout cycles, the homocysteine concentration had returned to baseline values in all groups.

Conclusion(s)

Oral E2 therapy reduced the homocysteine concentration more than did therapy with transdermal E2 or oral E2 plus gestodene. This finding may indicate a role of liver metabolism and suggests that gestodene has a negative effect on these changes.

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

b Department of Clinical Chemistry, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

d Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands

e Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

f Department of Internal Medicine, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: M. J. van der Mooren, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands (FAX: 31-20-44-44-422).

 Supported by research grants from the Netherlands Heart Foundation (grant 95.201), Biocare Foundation (grant 96.312), and Schering AG (Berlin, Germany, grant 96.083).

PII: S0015-0282(02)04661-7

doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04661-7


View previous. 4 of 49 View next.