Fertility and Sterility
Volume 82, Issue 1 , Pages 241-243 , July 2004

Conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for sibling oocytes in couples with mild oligoteratoasthenozoospermia and couples with normal sperm

Presented at the 2002 ASRM Annual Meeting, Seattle, Washington, October 12–17, 2002.

  • Shai E Elizur, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Shai Elizur, M.D., IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel (FAX: 972-3-5341589).
    • IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
    • ,
  • Jacob Levron, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
    • ,
  • Daniel S Seidman, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
    • ,
  • Salim Kees, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Assuta Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel
    • ,
  • David Levran, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel Assuta Hospital, Tel Aviv, Israel
    • ,
  • Jehoshua Dor, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVF Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel

Received 19 May 2003 ,Revised 4 November 2003 ,Accepted 4 November 2003.

References 

  1. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17–18
  2. Plachot M, Belaisch-Allart J, Mayenga JM, Chouraqui A, Tesquier L, Serkine AM. Outcome of conventional IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes in mild male factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:362–369
  3. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Sattar MA, Amin YM. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization for sibling oocytes in cases of unexplained infertility and borderline semen. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;13:38–42
  4. Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Staessen C, De Vos A, Vandervorst M, Van Steirteghem A. Controlled comparison of conventional in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with asthenozoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2313–2319
  5. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:725–730
  6. Calderon G, Belil I, Aran B, Veiga A, Gil Y, Boada M, et al.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in-vitro fertilization (first results). Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2835–2839
  7. Pisarska MD, Casson PR, Cisneros PL, Lamb DJ, Lipshultz LI, Buster JE, et al.  Fertilization after standard in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in subfertile males using sibling oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:627–632
  8. Hershlag A, Paine T, Kvapil G, Feng H, Napolitano B. In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection split (an insemination method to prevent fertilization failure). Fertil Steril. 2002;77:229–232
  9. Fishel S, Aslam I, Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Timson J, Jacobson M, et al.  Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception?. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1278–1283
  10. Benadiva CA, Nulsen J, Siano L, Jennings J, Givargis HB, Maier D. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection overcomes previous fertilization failure with conventional in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:1041–1044
  11. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FS, Lombard CJ, Van der merwe JP, Van Jyl JA. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in-vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:1118–1123
  12. Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Albano C, Camus M, Van Landuyt L, Devroey P, et al.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus in vitro fertilization (a randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis of the literature). Fertil Steril. 2002;78:1030–1037
  13. Staessen C, Camus M, Clasen K, De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling oocytes from couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2474–2479
  14. Lundin K, Bergh C, Hardarson T. Early embryo cleavage is a strong indicator of embryo quality in human IVF. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2652–2657
  15. Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A, Sakkas D. Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (a paternal influence?). Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1632–1637
  16. Dumoulin JC, Coonen E, Bras M, Van wissen LC, Ignonl-Vanvuchelen R, Bergers-Jansen JM, et al.  Comparison of in-vitro development of embryos originating from either conventional in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:402–409
  17. Griffiths TA, Murdoch AP, Herbert M. Embryonic development in vitro is compromised by the ICSI procedure. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1592–1596
  18. Hsu MI, Mayer J, Aronshon M, et al.  Embryo implantation in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (impact of cleavage status, morphology grade, and number of embryos transferred). Fertil Steril. 1999;72:679–685
  19. Dumoulin JM, Coonen E, Bras M, Lanzendorf S, Muasher S, Kolm P, et al.  Embryo development and chromosomal anomalies after ICSI (effect of the injection procedure). Hum Reprod. 2001;16:306–312

PII: S0015-0282(04)00555-2

doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.11.053

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 82, Issue 1 , Pages 241-243 , July 2004

Article Tools