The role of fallopian tube anastomosis in training fellows: A survey of current reproductive endocrinology fellows and practitioners
Presented in part at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, San Antonio, Texas, October 11–15, 2003.
Received 15 August 2003; received in revised form 27 February 2004; accepted 27 February 2004.
Abstract
This survey of fellows and reproductive endocrinologists in practice suggests that decreasing numbers of tubal reanastomosis procedures are being performed. This change has occurred both in fellow training and in the clinical practice of reproductive endocrinologists.
aPediatric and Reproductive Endocrinology Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA;
bThe University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Aurora, Colorado, USA;
cVirginia Center for Reproductive Medicine, Reston, Virginia; George Washington UniversityWashington, D.C., USA;
dWalter Reed Army Medical Center Washington, D.C., USA
Reprint requests: Alicia Armstrong, M.D., 9D42 Pediatric and Reproductive Endocrinology Branch, NICHD, Bldg. 10, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA (FAX: 301-480-0665).
ABSTRACT