Fertility and Sterility
Volume 82, Issue 5 , Pages 1369-1373, November 2004

Predictive value of the presence of an embryonic heartbeat for live birth: Comparison of women with and without recurrent pregnancy loss

  • Jennifer S. Hyer, M.B.S.
  • ,
  • Shirley Fong, M.D.
  • ,
  • William H. Kutteh, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: William H. Kutteh, M.D., Ph.D., Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tennessee, Memphis, 80 Humphreys Center, Suite 307, Memphis, Tennessee 38120-2363 (FAX: 901-747-4446

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Immunology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee

Received 4 November 2003; received in revised form 29 March 2004; accepted 29 March 2004.

Objective

To determine the predictive value of an embryonic heart rate (EHR) for a live birth in women with and without a history of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).

Design

Prospective cohort study with concurrent controls.

Setting

A subspecialty clinic for couples with RPL.

Patient(s)

Three hundred pregnant women who previously had been diagnosed with RPL, followed prospectively compared with 300 age-, race-, and gestational age–matched pregnant control women.

Intervention(s)

Transvaginal sonography between 6 to 8 weeks of gestation.

Main outcome measure(s)

The EHR was determined between 6 and 8 weeks of gestation by transvaginal sonography. Obstetrical history and current pregnancy outcome were evaluated.

Result(s)

Data were analyzed by using the two-tailed t test and Fisher's exact test. In women with RPL, an EHR predicted a successful live birth in 246 (82%) of 300, compared with 294 (98%) of 300 in control women. The mean (± SD) EHR from successful pregnancies in the control group (143.2 ± 20.8 beats per minute) was significantly higher than the mean in women with a history of RPL (131.4 ± 22.9 beats per minute).

Conclusion(s)

An EHR in women with RPL is associated with a live birth rate of 82% and is significantly lower than EHR in controls. Clinicians should use this information to counsel patients with RPL.

Key words:  Recurrent pregnancy loss, embryonic heart rate, ultrasonography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0015-0282(04)02226-5

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.058

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 82, Issue 5 , Pages 1369-1373, November 2004