Fertility and Sterility
Volume 82, Issue 5 , Pages 1303-1308, November 2004

Add-back therapy in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain

  • Errico Zupi, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Tor Vergata” University, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Daniela Marconi, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • San Giuseppe Hospital, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Marco Sbracia, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Marco Sbracia, M.D., Center for Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Via Carlo Porta 10, Rome 00153, Italy (FAX: 39-06-5880096
  • ,
  • Fulvio Zullo, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
  • ,
  • Bonaventura De Vivo, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Tor Vergata” University, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Caterina Exacustos, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Tor Vergata” University, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Giuseppe Sorrenti, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Policlinico “Tor Vergata” Hospital, Rome, Italy

Received 21 November 2003; received in revised form 15 March 2004; accepted 15 March 2004.

Objective

To determine the efficacy of GnRH analogue plus add-back therapy compared with GnRH analogue alone and estroprogestin in patients with relapse of endometriosis-associated pain.

Design

Randomized, controlled study.

Setting

University hospital.

Patient(s)

One hundred thirty-three women with relapse of endometriosis-related pain after previous endometriosis surgery.

Intervention(s)

Forty-six women were treated with GnRH analogue plus add-back therapy, 44 women were given GnRH analogue alone, and 43 women received estroprogestin, for 12 months.

Main outcome measure(s)

Pain evaluation by a visual analogue scale, quality of life in treated patients according to the SF-36 questionnaire, and occurrence of adverse effects, including bone mass density loss, at pretreatment, after 6 months of treatment, at the end of treatment (12 months), and 6 months after discontinuation of treatment.

Result(s)

Patients treated either with GnRH analogue alone or GnRH analogue plus add-back therapy showed a higher reduction of pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, and dyspareunia than patients treated with oral contraceptive, whereas patients treated with add-back therapy showed a better quality of life, as assessed with the SF-36 questionnaire, and adverse effects rate than the other two groups.

Conclusion(s)

Add-back therapy allows the treatment of women with relapse of endometriosis-associated pain for a longer period, with reduced bone mineral density loss, good control of pain symptoms, and better patient quality of life compared with GnRH analogue alone or oral contraceptive.

Key words:  Endometriosis-related pain , medical treatment , GnRH analogue , add-back therapy , estroprogestin

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0015-0282(04)02232-0

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.062

Refers to erratum:

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 82, Issue 5 , Pages 1303-1308, November 2004