Fertility and Sterility
Volume 82, Issue 6 , Pages 1654-1659, December 2004

Simultaneous analysis of cytoskeletal patterns and chromosome positioning in human fertilization failures

  • João Ramalho-Santos, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: João Ramalho-Santos, Ph.D., Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra, 3004-517 Coimbra, Portugal (FAX: + 351-239-826798
  • ,
  • Alexandra Amaral

      Affiliations

    • Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • ,
  • Raquel Brito

      Affiliations

    • Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Genetics and Human Reproduction, University Hospitals of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • ,
  • Mariana Freitas, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • ,
  • Teresa Almeida Santos, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Genetics and Human Reproduction, University Hospitals of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Received 7 January 2004; received in revised form 4 May 2004; accepted 4 May 2004.

Objective

To sequentially and reliably apply both tubulin immunocytochemistry (ICC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to human fertilization failures, thus providing a tool for a multiple analysis of arrest.

Design

Analysis of human fertilization failures at several stages of arrest.

Setting

Academic and clinical institutions.

Patient(s)

Consenting patients undergoing assisted reproduction technologies.

Intervention(s)

Failed fertilizations displaying signs of activation without pronuclear development, or with the absence of polar body emission or cleavage 48 hours after insemination or microinjection were analyzed. Fertilization failures were fixed and processed for ICC. After data was collected the same samples were then subjected to FISH analysis using probes for chromosomes X, Y, and 18.

Main outcome measure(s)

Simultaneous ICC and FISH data on the same sample.

Result(s)

Sequential application of straightforward standard ICC and FISH techniques was not possible, as the morphologic features had been altered, microtubular patterns were not preserved, and many samples were rendered opaque. Only chromatin at the cell surface or outside the oocyte/zygote, such as metaphase II spindles or polar body nuclei, could be routinely probed for FISH after ICC. However, an increase in detergent-induced sample permeabilization as well as the removal of several steps usually performed for FISH made it possible to directly compare microtubular patterns and chromosome position, regardless of chromatin status.

Conclusion(s)

Analysis of specific proteins by immunocytochemistry and of chromosome status/positioning by FISH can be carried out sequentially in human fertilization failures, irrespective of the stage of arrest.

Key words:  Human fertilization failures , microtubules , FISH , human oocyte , immunocytochemistry

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by a grant from the Portuguese National Science Foundation (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, FCT) to J. R.-S. (POCTI/ESP/38049/2001). A.A. is supported by a Ph.D. grant from FCT, Portugal (SFRH/BD/12665/2003).

PII: S0015-0282(04)02411-2

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.086

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 82, Issue 6 , Pages 1654-1659, December 2004