Fertility and Sterility
Volume 84, Issue 3 , Pages 578-579, September 2005

Academic practice plans have been detrimental to the practice of assisted reproductive technology

  • Richard J. Paulson, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Richard J. Paulson, M.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, 1240 North Mission Road, Room 8K9, Los Angeles, California 90033 (FAX: 323-226-2850)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Received 11 March 2005; received in revised form 11 March 2005; accepted 11 March 2005.

The clinical practice of assisted reproductive technology combines cutting-edge medical science and its nearly immediate application to clinical practice, thus epitomizing academic medical practice. However, assisted reproductive technology programs find it difficult to remain within the academic setting, owing to the lack of flexibility of academic practice plans.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0015-0282(05)01090-3

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.056

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 84, Issue 3 , Pages 578-579, September 2005

Article Tools