Fertility and Sterility
Volume 84, Issue 6 , Pages 1606-1612, December 2005

Removal of lysed blastomeres from frozen–thawed embryos improves implantation and pregnancy rates in frozen embryo transfer cycles

Reproductive Biology Associates, Atlanta, Georgia

Received 12 March 2005; received in revised form 10 June 2005; accepted 10 June 2005.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of degenerated (lysed) blastomere removal on implantation and pregnancy rates in cleavage-stage cryo–embryo transfer (ET) cycles.

Design

Randomized clinical trial.

Setting

Private reproductive medical center.

Patient(s)

A total of 88 patients who received frozen–thawed ET, divided into two groups.

Intervention(s)

Embryo freezing and thawing; opening of the zona pellucida and removal of cryodamaged blastomeres (in the study group), followed by same-day ET.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Extent of survival of cleavage-stage embryos after the freeze–thaw procedure; embryo implantation and clinical pregnancies.

Result(s)

Oocyte number per patient, fertilization rate, embryo development rate (and quality), and freezing rates were similar in the two groups in the fresh cycle. In the control group, a total of 55 embryos (25%) of the 217 thawed remained fully intact, and 53 (26%) of the 207 in the study group remained intact. The average number of embryos transferred per group was similar (control, 3.4 ± 0.9; study, 3.3 ± 0.9). Implantation rates were 12% and 26% in the control and study groups, respectively. The clinical pregnancy rate was 23% in the control group and 64% in the study group when lysed cell removal was performed.

Conclusion(s)

The results show that pregnancy and implantation rates are higher in the study group; therefore, the removal of degenerated blastomeres may be beneficial to all patients who undergo cleavage-stage, frozen–thawed ET.

Key Words:  Assisted hatching , cryopreservation , embryo , implantation , pregnancy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0015-0282(05)02943-2

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.06.027

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 84, Issue 6 , Pages 1606-1612, December 2005