Fertility and Sterility
Volume 87, Issue 3 , Pages 554-564, March 2007

The healthy men study: design and recruitment considerations for environmental epidemiologic studies in male reproductive health

  • Andrew F. Olshan, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Andrew F. Olshan, Ph.D., CB#7435, 2101B McGavran-Greenberg Hall, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435 (FAX: 919-966-2089)
  • ,
  • Sally D. Perreault, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Toxicology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Lorrie Bradley, B.A.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • ,
  • Rebecca M. Buus, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Toxicology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Lillian F. Strader, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Toxicology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Susan C. Jeffay, B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Toxicology Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  • ,
  • Lyle Lansdell, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • ,
  • David A. Savitz, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • ,
  • Amy Herring, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Received 24 January 2006; received in revised form 17 July 2006; accepted 17 July 2006. published online 30 November 2006.

Objective

To describe study design, conduct and response, and participant characteristics.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Participants were male partners of women who were enrolled in a community-based prospective cohort study of drinking water disinfection by-products and pregnancy health.

Patient(s)

Two hundred thirty presumed fertile men recruited from 3 study sites in the United States.

Intervention(s)

Men completed a telephone interview about demographics, health history, and exposures and provided a semen sample that was express mailed to the study laboratory.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Response and participation rates, participant demographics, and lifestyle exposures.

Result(s)

We obtained a high participation rate (84%) among men who were located, but a low overall response rate (25%). Participants were more likely to be white, more highly educated, be married, and have a higher household income than the underlying study cohort.

Conclusion(s)

Our multisite study design may be applicable to the study of community environmental factors and reproductive health of men. Our design was efficient in that men from geographically disparate sites could be recruited, a semen sample was collected at home, and a telephone interview was conducted from a central study site. Despite these design features, the low response rates may suggest selection bias that can be addressed partially in the analysis.

Key Words: Male, semen, epidemiology, environmental exposure, sperm, water pollutants

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclaimer: Although the research described in this article has been supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, it has not been subjected to Agency review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency, and no official endorsement should be inferred. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.Supported in part by grants from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (R-82932701) and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES10126).

PII: S0015-0282(06)04027-1

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1517

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 87, Issue 3 , Pages 554-564, March 2007