Fertility and Sterility
Volume 87, Issue 6 , Pages 1301-1305, June 2007

Update on the comparison of assisted reproduction outcomes between Europe and the USA: the 2002 data

  • Norbert Gleicher, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Human Reproduction, New York, New York, and Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
    • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Norbert Gleicher, M.D., CHR, 21 East 69th Street, New York, NY 10021 (FAX: 212-994-4499).
  • ,
  • Andrea Weghofer, M.D., Ph.D

      Affiliations

    • Center for Human Reproduction, New York, New York, and Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Allgemeine Krankenhaus, University of Vienna School of Medicine, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • David Barad, M.D., M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Human Reproduction, New York, New York, and Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
    • Departments of Epidemiology and Social Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, The Bronx, New York

Received 9 September 2006; received in revised form 15 November 2006; accepted 15 November 2006. published online 07 April 2007.

Objective

In follow-up to an earlier study of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in Europe and the U.S. for the year 2001, the present study reports on 2002 outcomes in an attempt to determine diverging practice trends.

Design

Retrospective cohort comparisons.

Setting

Academically affiliated private fertility center.

Patient(s)

This study involved overall 324,238 IVF cycles in Europe and 115,538 cycles in the U.S.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Pregnancy and delivery rates for fresh IVF cycles, frozen-thawed cycles, and oocyte donation cycles.

Result(s)

This study confirms continuing pregnancy outcome differences in all aspects of assisted reproduction to the benefit of the U.S., a much higher use of IVF procedures in Europe, and larger embryo transfer numbers and multiple pregnancy rates in the U.S., although both continents demonstrate an almost identical trend toward fewer embryos and lower multiple pregnancy rates.

Conclusion(s)

Universally lower pregnancy rates in Europe remain of concern, especially because the trend between 2001 and 2002 suggests a possible further widening of the gap. Initiatives that may further reduce European pregnancy rates, such as increasing emphasis on single-embryo transfers and legislative interventions, should therefore be introduced with caution.

Key Words: In vitro fertilization (IVF), assisted reproductive technologies (ART), multiple births, cost effectiveness, utilization, oocyte donation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0015-0282(06)04503-1

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.024

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 87, Issue 6 , Pages 1301-1305, June 2007