Fertility and Sterility
Volume 88, Issue 4 , Pages 915-924 , October 2007

Bayesian selection of optimal rules for timing intercourse to conceive by using calendar and mucus

  • Bruno Scarpa, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
    • ,
  • David B. Dunson, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: David B. Dunson, Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 (FAX: 86-571-87061878).
    • ,
  • Elena Giacchi, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Centre of Study and Research on Natural Fertility Regulation, Catholic University of The Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy

Received 28 June 2006 ,Revised 13 December 2006 ,Accepted 13 December 2006.

References 

  1. Pinnelli A, Di Cesare M. Human fertility: socio-demographic aspects. Contraception. 2005;72:303–307
  2. Stöbel-Richter Y, Beutel MF, Finck C, Brahler E. The wish to have a child, childlessness, and infertility in Germany. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2850–2857
  3. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation: effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1517–1521
  4. Dunson DB, Baird DD, Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR. Day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy based on two studies with imperfect measures of ovulation. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1835–1839
  5. McGovern PG, Myers ER, Silva S, Coutifaris C, Carson SA, Legro RS, et al. NICHD National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. Absence of secretory endometrium after false-positive home urine luteinizing hormone testing. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:1273–1277
  6. Nielsen MS, Barton SD, Hatasaka HH, Stanford JB. Comparison of several one-step home urinary luteinizing hormone detection test kits to OvuQuick. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:384–387
  7. Dunson DB, Weinberg CR, Baird DD, Kesner JS, Wilcox AJ. Assessing human fertility using several markers of ovulation. Stat Med. 2001;20:965–978
  8. Behre HM, Kuhlage J, Gassner C, Sonntag B, Schem C, Schneider HP, et al. Prediction of ovulation by urinary hormone measurements with the home use ClearPlan Fertility Monitor: comparison with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum hormone measurements. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2478–2482
  9. Tanabe K, Susumu N, Hand K, Nishii K, Ishikawa I, Nozawa S. Prediction of the potentially fertile period and urinary hormone measurements using a new home-use monitor: comparison with laboratory hormone analyses. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1619–1624
  10. Curtis LA, Neitzel KN. Demographic and health survey, comparative studies no. 19. Contraceptive knowledge, use, and sources. Calverton, MD: Macro International; 1996;
  11. Stanford JB, Thurman PB, Lemaire JC. Physicians' knowledge and practices regarding natural family planning. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:672–678
  12. Stanford JB, White GL, Hatasaka H. Timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy: current evidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:1333–1341
  13. Ogino K. Ovulationstermin und Konzeptionstermin. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1930;54:464–479
  14. Colombo B, Scarpa B. Calendar methods of fertility regulation: a rule of thumb. Statistica. 1996;LVI:3–14
  15. Lamprecht VM, Grummer-Strawn L. Development of new formulas to identify the fertile time of the menstrual cycle. Contraception. 1996;54:339–343
  16. Arevalo M, Sinai I, Jennings V. A fixed formula to define the fertile window of the menstrual cycle as the basis of a simple method of natural family planning. Contraception. 1999;60:357–360
  17. Arevalo M, Jennings V, Sinai I. Efficacy of a new method of family planning: the Standard Days Method. Contraception. 2002;65:333–338
  18. Billings EL, Billings JJ, Brown JB, Burger HG. Symptoms and hormonal changes accompanying ovulation. Lancet. 1972;1:282–284
  19. Hilgers TW, Stanford JB. Creighton-Model NaProEducation Technology for avoiding pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 1998;43:495–502
  20. Sinai I, Jennings V, Arévalo M. The TwoDay algorithm: a new algorithm to identify the fertile time of the menstrual cycle. Contraception. 1999;60:65–70
  21. Dunson DB, Sinai I, Colombo B. The relationship between cervical secretions and the daily probability of pregnancy: effectiveness of the TwoDay Algorithm. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2278–2282
  22. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups . European multi-center study of natural family planning (1989–1995): efficacy and drop-out. Adv Contracept. 1999;15:69–83
  23. Fehring RJ, Raviele K, Schneider M. A comparison of the fertile phase as determined by the Clearplan Easy Fertility Monitor and self-assessment of cervical mucus. Contraception. 2004;69:9–14
  24. Snick HKA. Should spontaneous or timed intercourse guide couples trying to conceive?. Hum Reprod. 2005;10:2976–2977
  25. Hilgers TW, Daly KD, Prebil AM, Hilgers SK. Cumulative pregnancy rates in patients with apparently normal fertility and fertility-focused intercourse. J Reprod Med. 1992;37:864–866
  26. Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, Frank-Hermann P, Freundl G. Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1959–1966
  27. Colombo B, Mion A, Passarin K, Scarpa B. Cervical mucus symptom and daily fecundability: first results from a new data base. Stat Methods Med Res. 2006;5:161–180
  28. Bigelow J, Dunson DB, Stanford JB, Ecochard R, Gnoth C, Colombo B. Mucus observations in the fertile window: a better predictor of conception than timing of intercourse. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:889–892
  29. Colombo B, Masarotto G. Daily fecundability: first results from a new data base. Demogr Res. 2000;3:5
  30. Knight J, Clubb E. Fertility. Devon, UK: David and Charles; 1996;
  31. Dunson DB, Stanford JB. Bayesian inferences on predictors of conception probabilities. Biometrics. 2005;61:126–133
  32. Barrett JC, Marshall J. The risk of conception on different days of the menstrual cycle. Popul Stud (Camb). 1969;23:455–461
  33. Colombo B. Evaluation of fertility predictors and comparison of different rules. Genus. 1998;LIV:153–167
  34. Hilgers TW, Prebil AM. The ovulation method—vulvar observations as an index of fertility/infertility. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;53:12–22
  35. Katz DF, Slade DA, Nakajima ST. Analysis of pre-ovulatory changes in cervical mucus hydration and sperm penetrability. Adv Contracept. 1997;13:143–151
  36. Odeblad E. Cervical mucus and their functions. J Irish Coll Phys Surg. 1997;26:27–32
  37. Dunson DB, Colombo B. Bayesian modeling of markers of day-specific fertility. J Am Stat Assoc. 2003;98:28–37
  38. Guida M, Tommaselli GA, Palomba S, Petticano M, Moccia G, Di Carlo C, et al. Efficacy of methods for determining ovulation in a natural family planning program. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:900–904
  39. World Health Organization . A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. III. Characteristics of the menstrual cycle and of the fertile phase. Fertil Steril. 1983;40:773–778
  40. Trussell J, Grummer-Strawn L. Further analysis of contraceptive failure of the ovulation method. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:2054–2059
  41. Zhou H, Weinberg CR. Modeling conception as an aggregated Bernoulli outcome with latent variables via the EM algorithm. Biometrics. 1996;52:945–954
  42. Schwartz D, MacDonald PDM, Heuchel V. Fecundability, coital frequency and the viability of ova. Popul Stud (Camb). 1980;34:397–400
  43. Royston JP. Basal body temperature, ovulation, and risk of conception, with special reference to the lifetimes of sperm and egg. Biometrics. 1982;38:397–406
  44. Weinberg CR, Gladen BC, Wilcox AJ. Models relating the timing of intercourse to the probability of conception and the sex of the baby. Biometrics. 1994;50:358–367
  45. Zhou HB, Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ, Baird DD. A random-effects model for cycle viability in fertility studies. J Am Stat Assoc. 1996;91:1413–1422
  46. Dunson DB, Weinberg CR. Modeling human fertility in the presence of measurement error. Biometrics. 2000;56:1256–1267
  47. Ecochard R, Boehringer H, Rabilloud M, Marret H. Chronological aspects of ultrasonic, hormonal, and other indirect indices of ovulation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;108:822–829
  48. Dominik R, Zhou H, Cai J. A statistical model for the evaluation of barrier contraceptive efficacy. Stat Med. 2001;20:3279–3294
  49. Dominik R, Chen P-L. Day specific pregnancy probability estimation in barrier conceptive effectiveness trials. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(Suppl 1):38–42
  50. Scarpa B, Dunson DB, Colombo B. Cervical mucus secretions on the day of intercourse: an accurate marker of highly fertile days. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;125:72–78
  51. Lunenfeld LE, Weiss N, Friger M, Jar-Vardi I, Koifman A, Potashnik G. Relationship between the duration of sexual abstinence and semen quality: analysis of 9,489 semen samples. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1680–1686
  52. Scarpa B, Dunson DB. Bayesian methods for searching for optimal rules for timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy. Stat Med. 2007;26:1920–1936
  53. Wilcox AJ, Dunson D, Baird DD. The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. BMJ. 2000;321:1259–1262
  54. Stanford JB, Smith KR, Dunson DB. Vulvar mucus observations and the probability of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:1285–1293
  55. Wilcox AJ, Dunson DB, Weinberg CR, Trussell J, Baird DD. Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives. Contraception. 2001;63:211–215
  56. Hilgers TW. The medical applications of natural family planning: a contemporary approach to women's health care. Omaha, NE: Pope Paul VI Institute Press; 1991;
  57. Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Friol K, Tigges J, Freundl G. Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1144–1147
  58. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Birmingham, AL: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; 2000;

 Supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Maryland) and by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Research Triangle Park, North Carolina).

PII: S0015-0282(07)00043-X

doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.017

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 88, Issue 4 , Pages 915-924 , October 2007

Article Tools