Fertility and Sterility
Volume 88, Issue 4 , Pages 900-905, October 2007

Lack of association between polycystic ovary syndrome and embryonic aneuploidy

  • Andrea Weghofer, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Andrea Weghofer, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria (FAX: 431404002861).
  • ,
  • Santiago Munne, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Reprogenetics, LLC, West Orange, New Jersey
  • ,
  • Serena Chen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • The Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey
  • ,
  • David Barad, M.D., M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • The Center for Human Reproduction,New York, New York
  • ,
  • Norbert Gleicher, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
    • The Center for Human Reproduction,New York, New York

Received 28 June 2006; received in revised form 22 December 2006; accepted 22 December 2006. published online 13 April 2007.

Objective

To determine whether women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are at increased risk for embryonic aneuploidy.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Academic teaching department, privately owned preimplantation genetics laboratory, and academically affiliated, private infertility center.

Patient(s)

The study included 174 women, ages 27–45 years, who underwent a single cycle of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with gonadotropins for in vitro fertilization. Amongst those, 74 were proven patients with PCOS, and 100 were control women with proven absence of PCOS.

Intervention(s)

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, and 22.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Embryonic morphology, in vitro fertilization cycle outcome parameters, and euploidy and aneuploidy rates.

Result(s)

Women with PCOS demonstrated similar overall percentages of euploid embryos (49.1% ± 28.1) when compared with control women (51.8% ± 30.1). However, a statistically significantly higher oocyte yield in patients with PCOS (22.8 ± 9.8 vs. 16.5 ± 7.6) resulted in statistically significantly higher absolute numbers of euploid embryos (3.3 ± 2.1 vs. 2.4 ± 2.0). When stratified for age (<38 y and ≥38 y) and egg numbers (10–20 and >20), euploidy rates still did not vary between study and control patients. High-responder patients with PCOS showed, however, statistically significantly reduced clinical- (42.9% vs. 69.0%) and ongoing-pregnancy rates (40.5% vs. 65.5%) compared with high-responder control women.

Conclusion(s)

Women with PCOS are not at increased risk for embryonic aneuploidy in the course of in vitro fertilization treatment. Indeed, because of their larger oocyte numbers, they produce more euploid embryos but have lower pregnancy rates after high oocyte yields. This lower pregnancy rate is, thus, not genetically caused and requires further investigation.

Key Words: Aneuploidy, in vitro fertilization, oocyte numbers, ovarian response, polycystic ovary syndrome, preimplantation genetic diagnosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0015-0282(07)00044-1

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.018

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 88, Issue 4 , Pages 900-905, October 2007