Fertility and Sterility
Volume 88, Issue 4 , Pages 822-831, October 2007

Aspirin in women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Mohammed Khairy, M.B.Ch.B.

      Affiliations

    • Assisted Conception Unit, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Kaberi Banerjee, M.B.Ch.B., M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Assisted Conception Unit, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Tarek El-Toukhy, M.B.Ch.B., M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Assisted Conception Unit, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Arri Coomarasamy, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Assisted Conception Unit, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom
    • Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: A. Coomarasamy, M.D., 4th Floor, Assisted Conception Unit, Thomas Guy House, Guys Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK (FAX: (+44) 2071880490).
  • ,
  • Yakoub Khalaf, M.B.Ch.B., M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Assisted Conception Unit, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Received 17 August 2006; received in revised form 9 December 2006; accepted 13 December 2006. published online 16 May 2007.

Objective

Many trials have evaluated the effects of aspirin in women undergoing IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment. These trials have generally shown inconclusive or inconsistent findings. We conducted a systematic review of trials of aspirin during IVF or ICSI treatment to generate more precise estimates of effects and attempt to explore the reasons for the inconsistencies.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting

Assisted conception units in different countries.

Patient(s)

Seven trials including 1,241 women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), IVF, or ICSI and day 3 embryo transfer.

Intervention(s)

Low-dose aspirin supplementation versus placebo or no supplementation.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Clinical pregnancy and live birth.

Result(s)

Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ISI Proceedings, and SCISEARCH, and all randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of aspirin compared to placebo or no treatment in women undergoing IVF–ICSI treatment were included. Study selection, quality appraisal, and data extractions were performed independently and in duplicate. Seven relevant trials were identified. Meta-analysis of these studies did not show a significant benefit of aspirin therapy in improving clinical pregnancy rate (relative risk [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95, 1.31) or live birth rate (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.64, 1.39). There was no significant difference in miscarriage rate (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.53, 2.11) or ectopic pregnancy rate (RR 2.24, 95% CI 0.70, 7.24). An improvement was noted in uterine artery pulsatility index (weighted mean difference: –0.78, 95% CI –0.87, –0.69) in women taking low-dose aspirin. The evidence regarding other outcomes was either not significant or contradictory.

Conclusion(s)

Currently available evidence does not support the use of aspirin in IVF or ICSI treatment. However, the noted trend of improvement in clinical pregnancy, and the lack of power even when the studies were pooled highlight the need for a definitive trial.

Key Words: IVF, pregnancy, low-dose aspirin, randomized trials

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0015-0282(07)00071-4

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.080

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 88, Issue 4 , Pages 822-831, October 2007