« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 89, Issue 3
, Pages 573-577
, March 2008
Day 4 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a prospective study of clinical outcomes
References
- . Day three versus day two embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2:CD004378
- . Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. The benefits of extended culture. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1405–1408
- . Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development. Nature. 1988;332:459–461
- . The probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer is affected by the age of the patient, cause of infertility, number of embryos transferred and the average morphology score, as revealed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:3035–3041
- . The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:117–119
- . Blastocyst transfer in day 5 embryo transfer depends primarily on the number of oocytes retrieved and not on age. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:78–83
- . Physiology and culture of the human blastocyst. J Reprod Immunol. 2002;55:85–100
- . Gamete and zygote transport. In: Knobil E, Neill J editor. The physiology of reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1994;p. 123–188
- . Comparison of embryo transfer on day 2, day 3, and day 6: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:454–455
- . Embryo morphology or cleavage stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1545–1549
- . Early embryo cleavage is a strong indicator of embryo quality in human IVF. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2652–2657
- . A prospective, randomized study comparing day 2 and day 3 embryo transfer in human IVF. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:476–480
- . Gene expression and chromatin structure in the pre-implantation embryo. Theriogenology. 2003;59:3–19
- . A comparison of in vitro fertilization results after embryo transfer after 2, 3, and 4 days of embryo culture. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:970–971
- Relationship between the day of embryo transfer and the outcome in human in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1994;11:401–404
- . Successful outcome with day 4 embryo transfer after preimplantation diagnosis for genetically transmitted diseases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1656–1659
- . Advantages of day 4 embryo transfer in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999;16:170–175
- . Implantation rates after in vitro fertilization and transfer of a maximum of two embryos that have undergone three to five days of culture. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:117–122
- Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1904–1908
- . The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1513–1518
- . Efficacy of day 4 embryo transfer (ET) in minimizing weekend staffing requirements. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(Suppl 3):126
- . Day 3 versus day 4 embryo transfer: does one day make a difference?. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(Suppl 3):23
- . Extended embryo culture reduces the implantation rate on day 4 and day 5 when only a maximum of three embryos are cultured beyond the pronuclear stage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;124:65–69
- . Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF?. Hum Reprod Update. 1997;3:367–382
- . Laser versus mechanical assisted hatching: a prospective study of clinical outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1596–1600
- . Cryopreservation of mouse embryos at morula/compact stage. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001;18:235–243
- . Pregnancies achieved after transferring frozen morula/compact stage embryos. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:629–631
PII: S0015-0282(07)00746-7
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.056
© 2008 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 89, Issue 3
, Pages 573-577
, March 2008

