Fertility and Sterility
Volume 89, Issue 6 , Pages 1718-1722, June 2008

Comparison of semen parameters in samples collected by masturbation at a clinic and at home

  • Saad Elzanaty, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Medicene Centre, Scanian Andrology Centre, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Saad Elzanaty, M.D., Ph.D., Reproductive Medicine Centre, Scanian Andrology Centre, Malmö University Hospital, SE 205 02, Malmö, Sweden (FAX: 46-040-338266).
  • ,
  • Johan Malm, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Chemistry, Malmö University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

Received 22 February 2007; received in revised form 24 May 2007; accepted 24 May 2007. published online 20 July 2007.

Objective

To investigate differences in semen quality between samples collected by masturbation at a clinic and at home.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Fertility center.

Patient(s)

Three hundred seventy-nine men assessed for infertility.

Intervention(s)

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Semen was analyzed according to World Health Organization guidelines. Seminal markers of epididymal (neutral α-glucosidase), prostatic (prostate-specific antigen and zinc), and seminal vesicle (fructose) function were measured. Two patient groups were defined according to sample collection location: at a clinic (n = 273) or at home (n = 106).

Result(s)

Compared with clinic-collected semen, home-collected samples had statistically significantly higher values for sperm concentration, total sperm count, rapid progressive motility, and total count of progressive motility. Semen volume, proportion of normal sperm morphology, neutral α-glucosidase, prostate-specific antigen, zinc, and fructose did not differ significantly between groups. An abnormal sperm concentration (<20 × 106/mL) was seen in statistically significantly fewer of the samples obtained at home (19/106, 18%) than at the clinic (81/273, 30%), and the same applied to proportions of samples with abnormal (< 25%) rapid progressive motility (68/106 [64%] and 205/273 [75%], respectively).

Conclusion(s)

The present results demonstrate superior semen quality in samples collected by masturbation at home compared with at a clinic. This should be taken into consideration in infertility investigations.

Key Words: Fertility, infertility, reproduction, semen collection, spermatozoa

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The study was financially supported by the Swedish Research Council (Stockholm, Sweden; Grant No 521-2002-3907), the Swedish Government Funding for Clinical Research (Lund, Sweden), the Crafoord Foundation (Lund, Sweden), the Ove Tulefjord Fund (Malmö, Sweden), and the Foundation for Urological Research (Malmö, Sweden).

PII: S0015-0282(07)01212-5

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.044

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 89, Issue 6 , Pages 1718-1722, June 2008