Cognitive development of singletons born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with in vitro fertilization and natural conception
Objective
To investigate cognitive development of singletons conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at 5–8 years of age.
Design
Follow-up study.
Setting
University medical center, assessments between March 2004 and May 2005.
Patient(s)
Singletons born between June 1996 and December 1999 after ICSI at the Leiden University Medical Center were compared with matched singletons born after IVF and natural conception (NC).
Intervention(s)
Mode of conception.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Intelligence quotient (IQ) was measured with the Revised Amsterdam Child Intelligence Test (short form). The investigators were blinded to conception mode.
Result(s)
Singletons conceived by ICSI (n = 83) achieved lower IQ scores than IVF singletons (n = 83) (adjusted mean difference IQ: 3.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) −0.8, 8.0]). After categorizing IQ outcomes (<85, 85–115, >115), no significant difference in the distribution of IQ was found. Singletons conceived by ICSI (n = 86) achieved lower IQ scores than NC singletons (n = 85); the adjusted mean difference varied between 5 and 7 points (5.6 [95% CI 0.9, 10.3]; 7.1 [95% CI 1.7, 12.5]) depending on the covariates included in the model. Adjustment for prematurity did not change the results. Percentages in IQ categories <85, 85–115, and >115 were 12%, 64%, and 24% for ICSI and 6%, 54%, and 40% for NC, respectively.
Conclusion(s)
In the relatively limited sample investigated, cognitive development among ICSI singletons was lower than among IVF and NC singletons. Infertility factors or unmeasured confounders may play a role.
Key Words: ICSI, IVF, child development, intelligence
To access this article, please choose from the options below
This study was funded by the Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Presented in poster form at the annual meeting of the Society of Pediatric Research, San Francisco, California, May 2006.
PII: S0015-0282(07)01447-1
doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.090
© 2008 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

