« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 88, Issue 4
, Pages 781-784
, October 2007
Substandard application of preimplantation genetic screening may interfere with its clinical success
References
- . Age of the uterus does not affect pregnancy or implantation rates; a study of egg donation in women of different ages sharing oocytes from the same donor. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:827–829
- Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:628–634
- . Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosome complement. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:534–541
- . Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:2185–2191
- Over a decade of preimplantation genetic diagnosis experience—a multicenter report. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:292–294
- Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2191–2199
- . Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:837–844
- Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:91–97
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly reduces pregnancy loss in infertile couples: a multi-center study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:326–332
- Preimplantation testing for chromosomal disorders improves reproductive outcome of poor prognosis patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:219–225
- . Increased efficiency of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for infertility using “no result rescue.”. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:53–61
- Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2849–2858
- Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:9–17
- . Multiple micromanipulations for PGD does not affect embryo development to blastocyst. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:1826–1829
- Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1021–1025
- . The combination of polar body and embryo biopsy does not affect embryo viability. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1163–1169
- . Removal of two cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests employed to enhance implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:496–503
- . The developmental potential of cryopreserved human embryos. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000;27:169:69–72
- Effect of UV laser on the development of mouse embryos assessed by microinjection of FITC-Dextran. Zygote. 1993;1:43–48
- . Blastomere fixation techniques and risk of misdiagnosis for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;4:210–217
- Differences in chromosome susceptibility to aneuploidy and survival to first trimester. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;8:81–90
- . Incidence and timing of pregnancy losses: relevance to evaluating safety of early prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet. 1990;35:165–173
- . Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day 3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day 5. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:685–693
S.M. is Director of Reprogenetics, a laboratory specializing in preimplantation genetic diagnosis. I.T.-K. has received research funding from Serono and is on the speaker's bureau for Organon. M.S. has a financial interest in Reprogenetics. Y.V. is owner and chief executive officer of Reproductive Genetics Institute, which operates clinics that provide preimplantation genetic diagnosis. J.L.S. is a member of the medical advisory board for Biocept and is a member of the scientific advisory board for IMETRIKUS.
PII: S0015-0282(07)03052-X
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.002
© 2007 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 88, Issue 4
, Pages 781-784
, October 2007

