« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 90, Issue 5
, Pages 1680-1684
, November 2008
A healthy live birth after successful preimplantation genetic diagnosis for carriers of complex chromosome rearrangements
References
- . Complex chromosome rearrangements. Report of a new case and literature review. Clin Genet. 1980;18:436–444
- . Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCR) and their genetic consequences. J Genet Hum. 1982;30:199–214
- . A complex chromosomal rearrangement detected prenatally and studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hum Genet. 1993;92:117–121
- . Molecular analysis of a complex chromosomal rearrangement and a review of familial cases. Am J Med Genet. 1994;53:255–263
- . Recombination in a balanced complex translocation of a mother leading to a balanced reciprocal translocation in the child. Review of 60 cases of balanced complex translocation. Hum Genet. 1997;99:806–815
- Assisted reproductive technology and complex chromosomal rearrangements: the limits of ICSI. Mol Hum Reprod. 1997;3:847–851
- Fluorescence in situ hybridization with human chromosome-specific libraries: detection of trisomy 21 and chromosome 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:9138–9142
- . Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries. Hum Genet. 1988;80:224–234
- . Chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization after Giemsa banding. Hum Genet. 1991;86:484–486
- . Fluorescence in situ hybridization characterization of apparently balanced translocation reveals cryptic complex chromosomal rearrangements with unexpected level of complexity. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12:647–653
- Clinical outcome of treatment cycles using preimplantation genetic diagnosis for structural chromosomal abnormalities. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21:781–787
- . Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;24:183–196
- . Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly improves the pregnancy outcome of translocation carriers with a history of recurrent miscarriage and unsuccessful pregnancies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:869–874
- Efficacy and clinical outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis using FISH for couples of reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations: the Korean experience. Prenat Diagn. 2004;24:556–561
- . Human cytogenetics. A practical approach. Vol. 1. Constitutional analysis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992;36–41
- In situ hybridisation as a tool to study numerical aberrations in solid bladder tumors. Histochemistry. 1988;89:307–316
- . Optimal preparation of preimplantation embryo interphase nuclei for analysis by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:533–537
- . Chromosome translocations: segregation modes and strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:1437–1449
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities: implications from the outcome couples with chromosomal rearrangements. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23:652–662
- The importance of aneuploidy screening in reciprocal translocation carriers. Reproduction. 2006;131:1025–1035
- Complex chromosomal rearrangement and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a case report. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1292–1297
- Analysis of a de novo complex chromosome rearrangement involving chromosomes 4, 11, 12 and 13 and eight breakpoints by conventional cytogenetic, fluorescence in situ hybridization and spectral karyotyping. Prenat Diagn. 1999;19:1143–1149
- Recombinant balanced and unbalanced translocations as a consequence of a balanced complex chromosomal rearrangement involving eight breakpoints in four chromosomes. Eur J Hum Genet. 1999;7:873–883
- . Familial complex chromosomal rearrangement resulting in duplication/deletion of 6q14 to 6q16. Clin Genet. 1993;43:117–121
- . Familial complex chromosome rearrangement giving rise to balanced and unbalanced recombination products. Am J Med Genet. 1998;79:30–34
- Prenatal diagnosis of a familial chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 5, 10, 16 and 18. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:102–104
PII: S0015-0282(07)03159-7
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.016
© 2008 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 90, Issue 5
, Pages 1680-1684
, November 2008

