Fertility and Sterility
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 263-277 , February 2008

Motivation to donate or not donate surplus embryos for stem-cell research: literature review

  • Kristina Hug, M.A.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Kristina Hug, M.A., Department of Medical Ethics, Lund University, MBC C 13, Klinikgatan, 221 84 Lund, Sweden (FAX: +46-46-22 212 85).

Received 10 September 2007 ,Accepted 10 September 2007.

References 

  1. McMahon C, Gibson FL, Leslie GI, Saunders DM, Porter KA, Tennant C. Embryo donation for medical research: attitude and concerns of potential donors. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:871–877
  2. Bjuresten K, Hovatta O. Donation of embryos for stem cell research—how many couples consent?. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1353–1355
  3. Parry S. (Re)constructing embryos in stem cell research: exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2349–2359
  4. Park S-P, Lee YJ, Lee KS, Shin HA, Cho HY, Chung KS, et al. Establishment of human embryonic stem cell lines from frozen-thawed blastocysts using STO cell feeder layers. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:676–684
  5. Hug K. Sources of human embryos for stem cell research: ethical problems and their possible solutions. Medicina (Kaunas). 2005;41:1002–1010
  6. Borge OJ, Evers K. Aspects on properties, use and ethical considerations of embryonic stem cells—a short review. Cytotechnology. 2003;41:59–68
  7. Nisker J, White A. The CMA Code of Ethics and the donation of fresh embryos for stem cell research. CMAJ. 2005;173:621–622
  8. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. Group of Advisers on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology to the European Commission. Opinion no. 15 14/11/2000. Ethical aspects of human stem cell research and use. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/docs/avis15_en.pdf. Last accessed January 12, 2007.
  9. Hug K. Derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines. J Stem Cells. In press.
  10. Bangsbøll S, Pinborg A, Yding Anderson C, Nyboe Andersen A. Patients' attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2415–2419
  11. Skoog-Svanberg A, Boivin J, Bergh T. Factors influencing the decision to use or discard cryopreserved embryos. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:849–855
  12. Newton CR, McDermid A, Tekpetey F, Tummon IS. Embryo donation: attitudes towards donation procedures and factors predicting willingness to donate. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:878–884
  13. Lornage J, Chorier H, Boulieu D, Mathieu C, Czyba JC. Six years' follow-up of cryopreserved human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2610–2616
  14. Baylis F, Ram N. Eligibility of cryopreserved human embryos for stem cell research in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005;27:949–955
  15. Cohen CB. Use of “excess” human embryos for stem cell research: protecting women's rights and health. Womens Health Issues. 2000;10:121–126
  16. Andrews PW, Benvenisty N, Mc Kay R, Pera MF, Rossant J, Semb H, et al. The International Stem Cell Initiative: toward benchmarks for human embryonic stem cell research. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:795–797
  17. Hoffman DI, Zellman GL, Fair CC, Mayer JF, Zeitz JG, Gibbons WE, et al. Society for Assisted Reproduction Technology (SART) and RAND. Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1063–1069
  18. Baylis F, Beagan B, Johnston J, Ram N. Cryopreserved human embryos in Canada and their availability for research. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25:1026–1031
  19. Baylis F. Human embryonic stem cell lines: the ethics of derivation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002;24:159–163
  20. Cowan CA, Klimanskaya I, McMahon J, Atienza J, Witmyer J, Zucker JP, et al. Derivation of embryonic stem-cell lines from human blastocysts. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1353–1356
  21. Reubinoff BE, Pera MF, Fong CY, Trounson A, Bongso A. Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:399–404
  22. Peura TT, Bosman A, Stojanov T. Derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines. Theriogenology. 2007;67:32–42
  23. Barratt CL, St John JC, Afnan M. Clinical challenges in providing embryos for stem-cell initiatives. Lancet. 2004;364:115–118
  24. Bankowski BJ, Lyerly AD, Faden RR, Wallach EE. The social implications of embryo cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:823–832
  25. Byrd W. Cryopreservation, thawing, and transfer of human embryos. Semin Reprod Med. 2002;20:37–43
  26. Gardner DK, Lane M. Blastocyst transfer. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;46:231–238
  27. Kattera S, Chen C. A modified embryo cryopreservation method increases post-thaw survival with a concomitant increase in implantation. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1498–1504
  28. Schwartz PH, Rae SB. An approach to the ethical donation of human embryos for harvest of stem cells. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:771–775
  29. Pickering SJ, Braude PR, Patel M, Burns CJ, Trussler J, Bolton V, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as a novel source of embryos for stem cell research. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:353–364
  30. Munne S, Velilla E, Colls P, Garcia Bermudez M, Vemuri MC, Steuerwald N, et al. Self-correction of chromosomally abnormal embryos in culture and implications for stem cell production. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1328–1334
  31. Niemitz EL, Feinberg AP. Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: a call for investigation. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:599–609
  32. Nachtigall RD, Becker G, Friese C, Butler A, MacDougall K. Parents' conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:431–434
  33. Laruelle C, Englert Y. Psychological study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer participants' attitudes toward the destiny of their supernumerary embryos. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:1047–1050
  34. Darlington N, Matson P. The fate of cryopreserved human embryos reaching their legal limit of storage within a West Australian in vitro clinic. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2343–2344
  35. Van Voorhis B, Grinstead D, Sparks A, Gerard J, Weir R. Establishment of a successful donor embryo program: medical, ethical and policy issues. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:604–608
  36. Oghoetuoma J, McKeating C, Horne G, Brison D, Lieberman B. Use of in vitro fertilization embryos cryopreserved for 5 years or more. Lancet. 2000;355:1336
  37. McMahon C, Gibson F, Cohen J, Leslie G, Tennant C, Saunders D. Mothers conceiving through in vitro fertilization: siblings, setbacks, and embryo dilemmas after five years. Reprod Technol. 2000;10:131–135
  38. Choudhary M, Haimes E, Herbert M, Stojkovic M, Murdoch AP. Demographic, medical and treatment characteristics associated with couples' decisions to donate fresh spare embryos for research. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2091–2096
  39. Hammarberg K, Tinney L. Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples' decisions and the factors influencing their choice. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:86–91
  40. Krones T, Neuwohner E, Bock K, Manolopoulos K, Tinneberg HR, Richter G. Attitudes of patients, healthcare professionals and ethicists towards embryonic stem cell research and donation of gametes and embryos in Germany. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:607–617
  41. Burton PJ, Sanders K. Patient attitudes to donation of embryos for research in Western Australia. Med J Aust. 2004;180:559–561
  42. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282:1145–1147
  43. Hounshell CV, Chetkowski RJ. Donation of frozen embryos after in vitro fertilization is uncommon. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:837–838
  44. de Lacey S. Parent identity and “virtual” children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1661–1669
  45. Cattoli M, Borini A, Bonu MA. Fate of stored embryos: our 10 years experience. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;115:S16–S18
  46. Klipstein S, Reindollar RH, Regan MM, Alper MM. Gender bias in the disposition of frozen embryos. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:1181–1184
  47. Lyerly AD, Steinhauser K, Namey E, Tulsky JA, Cook-Deegan R, Sugarman J, et al. Factors that affect infertility patients' decisions about disposition of frozen embryos. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:1623–1630
  48. Elford K, Lawrence C, Leader A. Research implications of embryo cryopreservation choices made by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1154–1155
  49. Cooper S. The destiny of supernumerary embryos?. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:205–206
  50. Klock SC, Sheinin S, Kazer R. Couples' attitudes regarding embryo disposition after in vitro fertilization (IVF). Fertil Steril. 2001;76:S25
  51. Klock S, Sheinen S, Kazer R. The disposition of unused frozen embryos. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:69–70
  52. Haimes E, Luce J. Studying potential donors' views on embryonic stem cell therapies and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2006;9:67–71
  53. Alvarez-Diaz JA. Types of anxiety reported by couples treated with assisted fertilization vis a vis hypothetical embryo donation for research purposes in a private clinic in Lima, Peru. Gac Med Mex. 2006;142:223–228
  54. Corrigan O, Liddell K, McMillan J, Stewart A, Wallace S. Ethical, legal and social issues in stem cell research and therapy. A briefing paper from Cambridge Genetics Knowledge Park. Available at: http://www.eescn.org.uk/pdfs/elsi_paper.pdf. Last accessed February 7, 2007.
  55. Brzyski RG, Binkley PA, Pierce JD, Eddy CA. Impact of implementation of an embryo storage fee on embryo disposal activity. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:813–815
  56. Marcus SF, Appleton T, Marcus NK, Brinsden PR. Attitudes of donor couples towards embryo donation. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology, Göteborg, Sweden, June 21–24, 1998. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:238
  57. Bahadur G. Altruism in assisted reproductive technologies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2001;2:155–159
  58. Corrigan O. Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent. Sociol Health Illn. 2003;25:768–792
  59. Kingsberg SA, Applegarth LD, Janata JW. Embryo donation programs and policies in North America: survey results and implications for health and mental health professionals. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:215–220
  60. Boivin J. Is there too much emphasis on psychosocial counselling for infertile patients?. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:184–186
  61. Van Balen F. Choices and motivations of infertile couples. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;31:19–27
  62. Kovacs GT, Breheny SA, Dear MJ. Embryo donation at an Australian university in-vitro fertilisation clinic: issues and outcomes. Med J Aust. 2003;178:127–129
  63. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Donating spare embryos for embryonic stem-cell research. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:224–227
  64. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Updated guidelines for human pluripotent stem cell research, June 29, 2007. Available at: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/34460.html. Last accessed July 12, 2007.
  65. Lo B, Chou V, Cedars MI, Gates E, Taylor RN, Wagner RM, et al. Medicine. Consent from donors for embryo and stem cell research. Science. 2003;301:921
  66. Daley GQ, Richter LA, Auerbach JM, Benvenisty N, Charo RA, Chen G, et al. The ISSCR Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Science. 2007;315:603–604
  67. de Lacey S. Patients' attitudes to their embryos and their destiny: social conditioning?. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21:101–112

 Edward E. Wallach, M.D.Associate Editor

PII: S0015-0282(07)03562-5

doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.017

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 263-277 , February 2008

Article Tools