Fertility and Sterility
Volume 90, Issue 6 , Pages 2190-2195, December 2008

Estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase of IVF-ICSI patients: a randomized, controlled trial

  • José Serna, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVI-Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • José L. Cholquevilque, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVI-Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Vito Cela, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “P. Fioretti” University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  • ,
  • Javier Martínez-Salazar, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVI-Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Antonio Requena, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVI-Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Juan A. Garcia-Velasco, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVI-Madrid, Madrid, Spain
    • Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Juan A Garcia-Velasco, M.D., IVI-Madrid, Santiago de Compostela 88, Madrid, Spain (FAX: 34 91 386 7133).

Received 12 June 2007; received in revised form 3 October 2007; accepted 3 October 2007. published online 14 January 2008.

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of transdermal E2 administration in the luteal phase of IVF/ICSI cycles.

Design

Prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

Setting

University-affiliated assisted reproduction center.

Patients

1) Pilot trial to test serum E2 behaviour during the luteal phase in women undergoing agonist as well as antagonist protocol; 2) women undergoing IVF/ICSI with good-quality embryos available.

Intervention(s)

One hundred seventy-six patients were randomized by random number list on the day of embryo transfer to either: 1) progesterone (P) only as luteal support (200 mg bid starting the following night after oocyte retrieval); or 2) E2 and P combined, applying E2 patches (100 μg/day) twice per week beginning on the day of embryo transfer with P, as in the P-only group.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

The primary outcome was implantation rate per embryo transfer; secondary outcome variables were pregnancy rate per embryo transfer, early pregnancy loss, multiple pregnancy rate, and midluteal P and E2 levels.

Result(s)

Hormonal levels did not differ between groups. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of implantation rate (34.9% [51 of 146] vs. 28.9% [41 of 142]), ongoing pregnancy rate 42% ([34 of 81] vs. 41.8% [33 of 79]), early pregnancy loss (15% [6 of 40] vs. 13.2% [5 of 38]), or multiple pregnancy rate (28.6% [12 of 42] vs. 24.4% [10/41]) in patients receiving P versus E2 + P.

Conclusion(s)

The addition of transdermal E2 to the luteal-phase P support of IVF cycles did not improve cycle outcomes in terms of implantation and pregnancy rates.

Key Words: Luteal phase support, estradiol IVF, implantation, corpus luteum function

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0015-0282(07)03874-5

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.021

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 90, Issue 6 , Pages 2190-2195, December 2008