« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 90, Issue 6
, Pages 2056-2059
, December 2008
How physicians and scientists can respond responsibly and effectively to religiously based opposition to human embryonic stem cell research
References
- . Human embryonic stem cell research: ethical and legal issues. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:74–78
- . The politics and promise of stem-cell research. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1189–1191
- . Human embryonic stem cell lines derived from single blastomeres. Nature. 2006;444:481–485
- . Embryo ethics—the moral logic of stem-cell research. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:207–209
- . Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles. J Med Ethics. 2006;32:36–42
- . Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University; 1996;
- . Bioethics, religion, and democratic deliberation: policy formation and embryonic stem cell research. HEC Forum. 2005;17:49–63
- . Zygote and “clonate”—the ethical use of embryonic stem cells. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:209–211
- . Intolerant tolerance. J Med Philos. 1994;19:161–181
- Bush GW. President discusses stem cell research. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/08/20010809-2.html (accessed May 19, 2007).
- . Prometheus's vulture and the stem cell promise. N Eng J Med. 2003;349:267–274
PII: S0015-0282(07)03927-1
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.044
© 2008 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 90, Issue 6
, Pages 2056-2059
, December 2008

