Fertility and Sterility
Volume 90, Issue 6 , Pages 2060-2067, December 2008

Bone mineral density in adolescent females using injectable or oral contraceptives: a 24-month prospective study

  • Barbara A. Cromer, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Barbara A. Cromer, M.D., Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, Ohio 44109 (FAX: 216-778-4223).
  • ,
  • Andrea E. Bonny, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Margaret Stager, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Rina Lazebnik, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Ellen Rome, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Julie Ziegler, M.A.

      Affiliations

    • MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Kelly Camlin-Shingler, L.I.S.W.

      Affiliations

    • MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
  • ,
  • Michelle Secic, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Secic Statistical Consulting, Inc., Chardon, Ohio

Received 4 August 2006; received in revised form 30 October 2007; accepted 30 October 2007. published online 28 January 2008.

Objective

To determine whether bone mineral density (BMD) is lower in hormonal-contraceptive users than in an untreated comparison group.

Design

Observational, prospective cohort; 24-month duration.

Setting

Adolescent clinics in a metropolitan Midwestern setting.

Patient(s)

Four hundred thirty-three postmenarcheal girls, 12–18 years of age, who were on depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA; n = 58), were on oral contraceptives (OCs; n = 187), or were untreated (n = 188).

Intervention(s)

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and OCs containing 100 μg of levonorgestrel and 20 μg of ethinyl E2.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Measurements of BMD at spine and femoral neck were obtained by using dual x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 6-month intervals.

Result(s)

Over 24 months, mean percentage change in spine BMD was as follows: DMPA, −1.5%; OC, +4.2%; and untreated, +6.3%. Mean percentage change in femoral neck BMD was as follows: DMPA, −5.2%; OC, +3.0%; and untreated, +3.8%. Statistical significance was found between the DMPA group and the other two groups. In the DMPA group, mean percentage change in spine BMD over the first 12 months was −1.4%; the rate of change slowed to −0.1% over the second 12 months. No bone density loss reached the level of osteopenia.

Conclusion(s)

Adolescent girls receiving DMPA had significant loss in BMD, compared with bone gain in the OC and untreated group. However, the clinical significance of this finding is mitigated by slowed loss after the 1st year of DMPA use and general maintenance of bone density values within the normal range in the DMPA group.

Key Words: Adolescents, oral contraceptives, bone mineral density, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01HD 39009 (Washington, D.C.) and by General Clinical Research Center grant M1RR008012 (National Institutes of Health, Washington, D.C.).

 Presented in part at the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research meeting, Seattle, Washington, October 4, 2004.

 E.R. served on the speaker's bureau for Merck (Whitehouse Station, N.J.). All other authors have nothing to disclose.

PII: S0015-0282(07)03956-8

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.070

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 90, Issue 6 , Pages 2060-2067, December 2008