Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 3 , Pages 749-766, March 2009

How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Unit for Human Reproduction, First Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

Received 8 June 2007; received in revised form 31 December 2007; accepted 31 December 2007. published online 21 July 2008.

Objective

To systematically review the literature to identify randomized controlled trials, which evaluate interventions aiming to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting

University-based hospital.

Intervention(s)

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Pregnancy rate.

Result(s)

Twenty-two eligible randomized controlled trials were identified that evaluated in total 15 interventions to increase pregnancy rates in poor responders. Based on limited evidence, the only interventions that appear to increase the probability of pregnancy were the addition of GH to ovarian stimulation (odds ratio for live birth: 5.22, confidence interval: 95% 1.09–24.99) and the performance of embryo transfer on day 2 compared with day 3 (ongoing pregnancy rate: 27.7% vs. 16.3%, respectively; difference: +11.4, 95% confidence interval: +1.6 to +21.0).

Conclusion(s)

Insufficient evidence exists to recommend most of the treatments proposed to improve pregnancy rates in poor responders. Currently, there is some evidence to suggest that addition of GH, as well as performing embryo transfer on day 2 versus day 3, appear to improve the probability of pregnancy.

Key Words: In vitro fertilization, live birth, ovarian stimulation, poor response

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 D.K. has nothing to disclose. E.M.K. has nothing to disclose. C.A.V. has nothing to disclose. E.G.P. has nothing to disclose. J.B. has nothing to disclose. B.C.T. has nothing to disclose.

 We declare that no financial conflict of interest exists with any commercial entity, whose products are described, reviewed, evaluated or compared in this manuscript.

PII: S0015-0282(08)00004-6

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.077

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 3 , Pages 749-766, March 2009