« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 3
, Pages 749-766
, March 2009
How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis
References
- . Evaluating strategies for improving ovarian response of the poor responder undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:667–676
- Comparison of “poor” responders with “good” responders using a standard buserelin/human menopausal gonadotrophin regime for in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:918–921
- . Combined gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist/human menopausal gonadotropin therapy (GnRH-a/hMG) in normal, high, and poor responders to hMG. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1991;8:33–36
- . Biological versus chronological ageing of oocytes, distinguishable by raised FSH levels in relation to the success of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2003–2008
- . Comparison of endocrinological and clinical profiles and outcome of IVF cycles in patients with one ovary and two ovaries. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:458–460
- . Could ovarian infection impair ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation?. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:252–253
- In vitro fertilization for patients with poor response and occult ovarian failure: a randomized trial. Reprod Technol. 2000;10:98–102
- . The influence of body mass index, basal FSH and age on the response to gonadotrophin stimulation in non-polycystic ovarian syndrome patients. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1207–1211
- . Assisted conception following poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:521–527
- . Early ovarian ageing: a hypothesis. Detection and clinical relevance. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1137–1139
- . Clinical management of low ovarian response to stimulation for IVF: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:61–76
- Management of poor responders in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:235–246
- . Publication bias in reproductive research. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2063–2066
- . Adjuvant growth hormone treatment during in vitro fertilization: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:113–120
- . Adjuvant growth hormone therapy in poor responders to in-vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:40–43
- . Double-blind placebo controlled study: human biosynthetic growth hormone for assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 1996;65:800–805
- . Cotreatment with growth hormone, after pituitary suppression, for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-control trial. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:1104–1110
- Zhuang GL, Wong SX, Zhou CQ. [The effect of co-administration of low dosage growth hormone and gonadotropin for ovarian hyperstimulation in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer]. Chung-Hua Fu Chan Ko Tsa Chih [Chin J Obstet Gynecol] 510;29:471–4.
- Does growth hormone-releasing factor assist follicular development in poor responder patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization?. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1939–1943
- . Pyridostigmine cotreatment for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in low responders undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:652–657
- . Adjuvant l-arginine treatment for in-vitro fertilization in poor responder patients. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1690–1697
- . Effects of transdermal testosterone application on the ovarian response to fsh in poor responders undergoing assisted reproduction technique—a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1204–1211
- A randomized single-blind controlled trial of letrozole as a low-cost IVF protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a preliminary report. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2031–2035
- . Prospective evaluation of two stimulation protocols for low responders who were undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:886–892
- . GnRH antagonist in IVF poor-responder patients: results of a randomized trial. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:189–193
- . A novel protocol of ovulation induction with delayed gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration combined with high-dose recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and clomiphene citrate for poor responders and women over 35 years. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1572–1577
- Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:402–406
- . A randomized prospective study of microdose leuprolide versus ganirelix in in vitro fertilization cycles for poor responders. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1568–1571
- Comparison of “short protocol” versus “antagonists” with or without clomiphene citrate for stimulation in IVF of patients with “low response”. Rev Iberoam Fertil Reprod Hum. 2003;20:355–360
- A controlled trial of natural cycle versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog flare cycles in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1542–1547
- . Cessation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH-a) upon down-regulation versus conventional long GnRH-a protocol in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:406–411
- High doses of gonadotrophins combined with stop versus non-stop protocol of GnRH analogue administration in low responder IVF patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2292–2296
- . Recombinant follicle stimulating hormone stimulation in poor responders with normal basal concentrations of follicle stimulating hormone and oestradiol: improved reproductive outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1431–1434
- . Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a routine indication in low responder patients. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2126–2129
- . Efficiency of changing the embryo transfer time from day 3 to day 2 among women with poor ovarian response: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:81–85
- . A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:685–718
- . Growth hormone enhances follicle-stimulating hormone-induced differentiation of cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology. 1986;118:1401–1409
- . Effects of growth hormone and growth hormone-releasing hormone on steroid synthesis in cultured human luteinizing granulosa cells. Gynecol Endocrinol. 1996;10:101–108
- . Human growth hormone enhances progesterone production by human luteal cells in vitro: evidence of a synergistic effect with human chorionic gonadotropin. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:92–96
- . Neuroendocrine regulation of human growth hormone secretion. Diagnostic and clinical applications. J Endocrinol Invest. 1988;11:441–462
- . Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 1991;43:109–142
- Human follicular nitric oxide pathway: relationship to follicular size, oestradiol concentrations and ovarian blood flow. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:1947–1951
- Immunohistochemical distribution of progesterone, androgen and oestrogen receptors in the human ovary during the menstrual cycle: relationship to expression of steroidogenic enzymes. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1589–1595
- . Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptor in the human ovary throughout the menstrual cycle in relation to oestrogen and progesterone receptor expression. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:184–190
- The role of local estrogen biosynthesis in males and females. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2000;11:184–188
- . Insulin-like growth factors and ovarian follicular development. Endocr Rev. 1992;13:641–669
- . Are estrogens of import to primate/human ovarian folliculogenesis?. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:389–424
- . The outcome of 150 babies following the treatment with letrozole and gonadotrophins. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:S95
- . Will GnRH antagonists provide new hope for patients considered “difficult responders” to GnRH agonist protocols?. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2959–2962
- . Recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH; Puregon) in assisted reproduction: more oocytes, more pregnancies. Results from five comparative studies. Hum Reprod Update. 1996;2:162–171
D.K. has nothing to disclose. E.M.K. has nothing to disclose. C.A.V. has nothing to disclose. E.G.P. has nothing to disclose. J.B. has nothing to disclose. B.C.T. has nothing to disclose.
We declare that no financial conflict of interest exists with any commercial entity, whose products are described, reviewed, evaluated or compared in this manuscript.
PII: S0015-0282(08)00004-6
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.077
© 2009 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 3
, Pages 749-766
, March 2009

