Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 3 , Pages 733-738, March 2009

A high oocyte yield for intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment is associated with an increased chromosome error rate

  • Thomas Haaf, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Human Genetics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Thomas Haaf, M.D., Institute for Human Genetics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, Bldg. 601, 55131 Mainz, Germany (FAX: 49-6131-175690).
  • ,
  • Antje Hahn

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Human Genetics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • ,
  • Anne Lambrecht

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Human Genetics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • ,
  • Bärbel Grossmann, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Human Genetics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • ,
  • Eva Schwaab, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Human Genetic Practice, Wiesbaden, Germany
  • ,
  • Omar Khanaga, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Fertility Center, Wiesbaden, Germany
  • ,
  • Thomas Hahn, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Fertility Center, Wiesbaden, Germany
  • ,
  • Achim Tresch, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • ,
  • Martin Schorsch, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Fertility Center, Wiesbaden, Germany

Received 13 August 2007; received in revised form 2 January 2008; accepted 3 January 2008. published online 04 March 2008.

Objective

To compare the chromosome error rate among oocytes from stimulated ovaries after retrieval of 1–5 oocytes, 6–10 oocytes, and >10 oocytes.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

A university-based human genetic institute in collaboration with a private fertility center.

Patient(s)

Nine hundred thirty-three women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with a poor prognosis.

Intervention(s)

Oocyte collection with ovarian stimulation. Polar body testing of ICSI oocytes for common chromosome errors.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Chromosome error rate in oocytes, as determined by five-color fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Result(s)

In women less than 35 years and women between 35 and 40 years undergoing the first ICSI cycle, oocytes from the high-yield group had an increased likelihood for detectable chromosome errors (50.9% and 54.6%, respectively), compared to the intermediate-yield group (34.9% and 43.8%) and the low-yield group (23.3% and 41.2%). The overall high rate (≥50%) of chromosomally abnormal oocytes in women more than 40 years appeared to be mainly due to the maternal age effect and increased only slightly with oocyte yield.

Conclusion(s)

Oocyte yield may be considered as an indicator of ovarian response to hormone stimulation. In women up to 40 years a high yield of oocytes after superovulation is associated with an increased chromosome error rate.

Key Words: Chromosome error, IVF/ICSI, oocyte yield, ovarian stimulation, polar body diagnosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by the Merck Serono Company.

 Conducted in collaboration with the Fertility Center Wiesbaden, a commercial provider of IVF/ICSI services.

PII: S0015-0282(08)00016-2

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.012

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 3 , Pages 733-738, March 2009