Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 4 , Pages 1050-1055, April 2009

Selection of patients for natural cycle in vitro fertilization combined with in vitro maturation of immature oocytes

  • Jin-Ho Lim, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Maria Fertility Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
  • ,
  • Seong-Ho Yang, M.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Maria Fertility Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
  • ,
  • Ye Xu, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Center of Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, The General Hospital of Beijing Army, Beijing, China
  • ,
  • San-Hyun Yoon, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Maria Fertility Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
  • ,
  • Ri-Cheng Chian, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Ri-Cheng Chian, Ph.D., Women's Pavilion F3-46, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1 (FAX: 514-843-1662).

Received 26 November 2007; received in revised form 8 January 2008; accepted 17 January 2008. published online 25 March 2008.

Objective

To determine a successful method of selecting patients for natural cycle IVF combined with in vitro maturation (IVM) of immature oocytes and to determine treatment efficacy.

Design

Retrospective analysis of IVF treatments.

Setting

Hospital IVF clinic.

Patient(s)

Women with infertility according to ovarian reserve and endocrine profile were selected for different treatments.

Interventions(s)

According to screening criteria, infertile women were divided into three treatments: [1] natural cycle IVF combined with IVM (IVF/M), [2] IVM alone, and [3] controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with gonadotropin.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

The distribution of completed IVF–ET cycles in each treatment; clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in each treatment.

Result(s)

A total of 417 cycles were started, and 410 cycles (98.3%) were completed. Of 410 cycles, 151 (36.8%) were treated by natural cycle IVF/M, 63 (15.4%) underwent IVM alone, and 196 (47.8%) underwent COH. With increasing age fewer cycles can be treated by natural cycle IVF/M or IVM. Clinical pregnancy rates were 40.4% (61 of 151) for natural cycle IVF/M, 41.3% (26 of 63) for IVM alone, and 37.8% (74 of 196) for COH. There were no differences in implantation rate in the three groups (17.8% [82 of 462], 16.7% [35 of 210], and 20.1% [103 of 513]).

Conclusion(s)

Natural cycle IVF/M together with IVM-alone treatment can offer more than 50% of infertile women with an acceptable pregnancy and implantations rates.

Key Words: Natural cycle, IVF, IVM, oocytes, pregnancy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 J.-H.L. has nothing to disclose. S.-H.Y. has nothing to disclose. Y.X. has nothing to disclose. S-H.Y. has nothing to disclose. R.-C.C. has nothing to disclose.

PII: S0015-0282(08)00160-X

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.066

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 4 , Pages 1050-1055, April 2009