Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 4 , Pages 1018-1022, April 2009

Luteal phase estradiol level: a potential predictive marker for successful pregnancy in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection

  • Ashalatha Ganesh, M.B.B.S., M.M.S.T.

      Affiliations

    • School of Medical Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
    • Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Salt Lake, Kolkata, India
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Ashalatha Ganesh, M.B.B.S., School of Medical Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721 302, India (FAX: 91-03222-282221).
  • ,
  • Sourendrakant Goswami, M.B.B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Salt Lake, Kolkata, India
  • ,
  • Ratna Chattopadhyay, M.B.B.S.

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Salt Lake, Kolkata, India
  • ,
  • Chandan Chakraborty, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • School of Medical Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
  • ,
  • Koel Chaudhury, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • School of Medical Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
  • ,
  • Baidya Nath Chakravarty, M.D., F.R.C.O.G.

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Salt Lake, Kolkata, India

Received 8 November 2007; received in revised form 16 January 2008; accepted 21 January 2008. published online 25 March 2008.

Objective

To analyze the role of luteal E2, P, and FSH levels in the prediction of clinical pregnancy in stimulated cycles.

Design

Prospective study.

Setting

Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Salt Lake, Kolkata, India.

Patient(s)

A total of 268 women aged <40 years undergoing their first IVF-ET/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Intervention(s)

Estimation of luteal phase serum E2, P, and FSH levels on days 0, 7, and 14 of ET.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Comparison of luteal phase hormonal profile in pregnant and nonpregnant women and interpretation by discriminant analysis.

Result(s)

A total of 113 pregnancies were achieved (42.16%). Age, basal FSH level, peak E2 level, number of oocytes retrieved, and number of embryos transferred were comparable between pregnant and nonpregnant women. Day-7 and day-14 luteal E2 levels were significantly different between the two groups. Progesterone levels were comparable in both groups on days 0 and 14. Levels of FSH showed statistically significant differences between the two groups on days 0, 7, and 14. Classification accuracy for E2, P, and FSH was 82.1%, 60.8%, and 67.51%, respectively.

Conclusion(s)

Luteal E2 concentration seems to be a promising marker of successful clinical pregnancy.

Key Words: Luteal phase, estradiol, FSH, progesterone, pregnancy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 A.G. has nothing to disclose. S.G. has nothing to disclose. R.C. has nothing to disclose. C.C. has nothing to disclose. K.C. has nothing to disclose. B.N.C. has nothing to disclose.

PII: S0015-0282(08)00168-4

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.074

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 4 , Pages 1018-1022, April 2009