Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 5 , Pages 1642-1645 , May 2009

Does vasectomy explain the difference in tubal sterilization rates between black and white women?

  • Sonya Borrero, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Divison of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • Center for Health Equity and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Sonya Borrero, M.D., Assistant Professor of Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, 230 McKee Place, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA (FAX: (412) 692-4838).
  • ,
  • Eleanor B. Schwarz, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Divison of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Matthew F. Reeves, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • James E. Bost, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Clinical Research Education, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Mitchell D. Creinin, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • Said A. Ibrahim, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Divison of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    • Center for Health Equity and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Received 11 December 2007 ,Revised 29 January 2008 ,Accepted 31 January 2008.

References 

  1. Mosher WD, Martinez GM, Chandra A, Abma JC, Wilson SJ. Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982–2002. Advance data from vital and health statistics; No. 350. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2004;
  2. Chandra A. Surgical sterilization in the United States: prevalence and characteristics, 1965–95. Advance data from vital and health statistics; series 23: No. 20. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1998;
  3. MacKay AP, Kieke BA, Koonin LM, Beattie K. Tubal sterilization in the United States, 1994–1996. Fam Plann Perspect. 2001;33:161–165
  4. Godecker AL, Thomson E, Bumpass LL. Union status, marital history, and female contraceptive sterilization in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 2001;33:35–41
  5. Piccinino LJ, Mosher WD. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982–1995. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:4–1046
  6. Bumpass LL, Thomson E, Godecker AL. Women, men, and contraceptive sterilization. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:937–946
  7. Borrero S, Schwarz EB, Reeves MF, Bost JE, Creinin M, Ibrahim SA. Race, insurance status, and tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:94–100
  8. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 46 . Benefits and risks of sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:647–658
  9. Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Tylor L. Peterson HB for the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. Poststerilization regret: finding from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:889–895
  10. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Available from: URL:http://www.census.gov/popest/datasets.html. Accessed April 4, 2007.
  11. National Center for Health Statistics. National Survey of Family Growth, cycle 6. Available from: URL:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg.htm. Accessed September 30, 2006.
  12. In:  Smedley BD,  Stith AY,  Nelson AR editor. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003;
  13. Philliber SG, Philliber WW. Social and psychological perspectives on voluntary sterilization: a review. Stud Fam Plann. 1985;16:1–29

 S.B. has nothing to disclose. E.B.S. has nothing to disclose. M.F.R. has nothing to disclose. J.E.B. has nothing to disclose. M.D.C. has received research funding from, and served as a consultant for, Organon, and has received research funding and honoraria from Bayer. S.A.I. has nothing to disclose.

PII: S0015-0282(08)00234-3

doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.103

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 5 , Pages 1642-1645 , May 2009