Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 6 , Pages 2361-2368, June 2009

Attitudes of high-risk women toward preimplantation genetic diagnosis

  • Gwendolyn Quinn, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
    • Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Gwendolyn Quinn, Ph.D., 12902 Magnolia Drive, MRC-CANCONT, Tampa, FL 33612 (FAX: 813-745-6525).
  • ,
  • Susan Vadaparampil, Ph.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
    • Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
  • ,
  • Crystal Wilson, B.A.

      Affiliations

    • Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
  • ,
  • Lindsey King, M.P.H., C.H.E.S.

      Affiliations

    • Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
  • ,
  • Jimin Choi, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
  • ,
  • Cheryl Miree, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
  • ,
  • Sue Friedman, D.V.M.

      Affiliations

    • Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
    • Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered (FORCE), Tampa, Florida

Received 7 January 2008; received in revised form 5 March 2008; accepted 7 March 2008. published online 28 April 2008.

Objective

To explore the knowledge and attitudes toward preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of women who have been personally affected by hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Design

A 33-item quantitative survey covering five domains, including demographics, knowledge and attitudes about PGD, usage of PGD, and informational needs.

Setting

Attendees of a national conference for individuals and families affected by hereditary breast and ovarian cancer participated in the survey.

Patient(s)

Not applicable.

Intervention(s)

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Frequencies and proportions were summarized for all variables, and Fisher's exact tests were conducted to test association between two discrete variables.

Result(s)

Of the women surveyed, only 32% had ever heard of PGD before taking the survey. None of the women surveyed had actually used PGD, and 44% believed they would not use it in the future. However, 57% of attendees believed that PGD was an acceptable option for high-risk individuals, and 74% believed that high-risk individuals should be given information about PGD.

Conclusion(s)

Health care professionals who serve cancer patients should consider incorporating information about PGD into patient education. Further research is needed to survey physicians and genetic counselors about their knowledge and opinions of PGD.

Key Words: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2), hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 G.Q. has nothing to disclose. S.V. has nothing to disclose. C.W. has nothing to disclose. L.K. has nothing to disclose. J.C. has nothing to disclose. C.M. has nothing to disclose. S.F. has nothing to disclose.

 Supported in part by the Survey Methods Core Facility at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute and RSGPB-07-019-01-CPPB, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA.

PII: S0015-0282(08)00590-6

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.019

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 6 , Pages 2361-2368, June 2009