Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 6 , Pages 2596-2601, June 2009

Trial development of the Cognitive Appraisal Scale for Infertility (CASI) (version 1)

  • Yoshiko Saito, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
    • Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Yoshiko Saito, M.D., Faculty of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe University, 840 Shijyo-Cho, Kashihara-City, Nara 634-8521, Japan (FAX: 81-744-29-7555).
  • ,
  • Hiroya Matsuo, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan

Received 15 February 2008; received in revised form 18 March 2008; accepted 18 March 2008. published online 13 June 2008.

Objective

To develop the Cognitive Appraisal Scale for Infertility (CASI) and assess it for reliability and validity.

Design

Cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

Setting

A private fertility institute in Japan.

Patient(s)

223 infertile women being treated at the institute.

Intervention(s)

Administration of questionnaire at initial consultation and 6 months later.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

A self-rating questionnaire of perceptions and feelings about infertility on a four-point Likert scale, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS). Internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test–retest reliability coefficients, and concurrent validity correlations.

Result(s)

Factor analysis identified eight factors with 35 items: difficulty accepting infertility, decrease in self-esteem, acceptance/coming to terms with new self-identity, despair, loss of libido and erosion of marital relationship, guilt, denial, and self-imposed isolation. Internal consistency for factors 1 and 2 was 0.88 and 0.82, for factors 3 to 8 was from 0.68 to 0.58. Test–retest reliability coefficients were 0.90 to 0.72. Concurrent validity correlations between CASI and STAI, and SDS ranged from 0.54 to 0.29.

Conclusion(s)

The CASI, a new and potentially useful scale to assess emotional responses to infertility, is still in development. Further refined CASI and standardized scores of each subscale could be efficient for clinical practice.

Key Words: Scale, infertility, infertile women, emotional responses to infertility, reliability, validity, anxiety, depression

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Y.S. has nothing to disclose. H.M. has nothing to disclose.

PII: S0015-0282(08)00713-9

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.052

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 91, Issue 6 , Pages 2596-2601, June 2009