Clinical factors determining pregnancy outcome after microsurgical tubal reanastomosis
Objective
To evaluate pregnancy rates after tubal microsurgical anastomosis.
Design
Retrospective study.
Setting
Private tertiary care center.
Patient(s)
Two hundred sixty-one women undergoing tubal microsurgical anastomosis.
Intervention(s)
Tubal anastomoses were performed by minilaparotomy using microsurgical principles and approximating proximal and distal tubal ends in a two-layer technique with 8-0 ethylon.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Pregnancy outcome was analyzed for the technique of sterilization, location of anastomosis, tubal length, age, and semen parameters.
Result(s)
After exclusion of 89 patients lost to follow-up (34%) and 8 who did not attempt to conceive, 164 of the 261 patients were analyzed.The overall intrauterine pregnancy rate was 72.5%, with a miscarriage rate of 18% and a tubal pregnancy rate of 7.7%. Related to age, the cumulative intrauterine pregnancy rate was, respectively, 81%, 67%, 50%, and 12.5% for patients <36, 36–40, 40–43, and >43 years. Mean time to pregnancy was respectively 6.9, 6.2, and 12.7 months, respectively, for patients aged <36, 36–39, and 40–43 years According to the type of sterilization, intrauterine pregnancies occurred in 72% after ring sterilization, 78% after clip sterilization, 68% after coagulation, and 67% after Pomeroy sterilization. Intrauterine pregnancies and ectopic pregnancies, respectively, occurred in 80% and 3.4% in the isthmo-isthmic, 63% and 18% in the isthmo-ampullar, 75% and 8.3% in the isthmo-cornual, 100% and 0% in the ampullo-ampullar, and 60% and 0% in the ampullo-cornual anastomosis groups. Tubal length after anastomosis did not influence the pregnancy rate. In case of fertile sperm, the pregnancy rate was found to be 80%, and it decreased to 50% in case of subfertile semen.
Conclusion(s)
Our results clearly demonstrate the validity of tubal microsurgical anastomosis, establishing a quasinormalization of the fertility potential and offering the opportunity for a spontaneous conception.
Key Words: Microsurgery, tubal anastomosis, pregnancy
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Sylvie G. has nothing to disclose. R.C. has nothing to disclose. P.P. has nothing to disclose. Stephan G. has nothing to disclose.
PII: S0015-0282(08)03369-4
doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.028
© 2009 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

