Fertility and Sterility
Volume 92, Issue 4 , Pages 1306-1311, October 2009

Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification

  • Yun-Xia Cao, M.D., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Yun-Xia Cao, M.D., Ph.D. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, People's Republic of China (FAX: 86-551-516-0238).
  • ,
  • Qiong Xing, M.D.
  • ,
  • Li Li, M.D.
  • ,
  • Lin Cong, M.D.
  • ,
  • Zhi-Guo Zhang, M.S.
  • ,
  • Zhao-Lian Wei, M.D.
  • ,
  • Ping Zhou, M.D.

Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, People's Republic of China

Received 11 July 2008; received in revised form 4 August 2008; accepted 6 August 2008. published online 20 October 2008.

Objective

To compare the survival, fertilization, early embryonic development, and meiotic spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in frozen-thawed human oocytes after slow-freezing and vitrification.

Design

A randomized study.

Setting

A university-affiliated assisted reproductive center.

Patient(s)

Donated extra eggs from women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment.

Intervention(s)

A total of 605 mature oocytes were divided into a slow-freezing group and a vitrification group for cryopreservation.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

After frozen-thawing, the oocyte survival rate, spindle assembly, and chromosome alignment were compared. The surviving oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and the rate of fertilization and embryo development were also compared in two groups.

Result(s)

The oocyte survival rate was statistically significantly lower in the slow-freezing group (75 out of 123, 61.0%) than the vitrification group (268 out of 292, 91.8%). The fertilization rate was the same for both groups, but the cleavage rate of zygotes was statistically significantly different between two groups: (slow-freezing, 25/46 (54.4%) versus vitrification, 142 out of 182 (78.0%). There was a considerable difference in the percentage of high-quality embryos between slow-freezing and vitrification groups: 6 out of 25 (24.0%) versus 60 out of 142 (42.3%), respectively. The percentage of blastocyst development was statistically significantly higher in the vitrification group (47 out of 60, 33.1%) than in the slow-freezing group (3 out of 25, 12.0%). There was a much higher percentage of oocyte abnormalities in terms of spindle assembly and chromosome alignment in the slow-freezing group (25 out of 64, 39.1%) compared with the vitrification group (11 out of 62, 17.7%).

Conclusion(s)

Vitrification is superior to the slow-freezing method, leading to improved oocyte survival rate, fertilization, and embryonic development in vitro. These results may be related to vitrified human oocytes incurring less damage to spindle integrity and chromosome alignment.

Key Words: Slow-freezing, vitrification, human, oocyte, meiotic spindle, chromosome, fertilization, development

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Y-X.C. has nothing to disclose. Q.X. has nothing to disclose. L.L. has nothing to disclose. L.C. has nothing to disclose. Z-G.Z. has nothing to disclose. Z-L.W. has nothing to disclose. P.Z. has nothing to disclose.

PII: S0015-0282(08)03556-5

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.069

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 92, Issue 4 , Pages 1306-1311, October 2009