Fertility and Sterility
Volume 92, Issue 5 , Pages 1638-1645, November 2009

Sperm DNA fragmentation levels in testicular sperm samples from azoospermic males as assessed by the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test

  • Marcos Meseguer, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVI, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Marcos Meseguer, Ph.D., Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, Plaza de la Policía Local, 3, Valencia 46015, Spain (FAX: 34-96-3050999).
  • ,
  • Rebeca Santiso, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Sección de Genética y Unidad de Investigación, Hospital “Teresa Herrera,” Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain
    • Centro Oncologico de Galicia, A Coruña, Spain
  • ,
  • Nicolas Garrido, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVI, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Manuel Gil-Salom, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVI, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Jose Remohí, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • IVI, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Jose Luis Fernandez, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Sección de Genética y Unidad de Investigación, Hospital “Teresa Herrera,” Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain
    • Centro Oncologico de Galicia, A Coruña, Spain

Received 2 June 2008; received in revised form 20 August 2008; accepted 20 August 2008. published online 11 November 2008.

Objective

To analyze sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in testicular sperm samples from patients with azoospermia either from spermatogenic failure or from duct obstruction. Several technologies can be applied in the evaluation of SDF, but given the ease and low costs, the sperm chromatin dispersion test (SCD) has emerged as a promising standard.

Design

Prospective blind observational cohort study.

Setting

University-affiliated private IVF setting.

Patient(s)

Azoospermic patients from couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Intervention(s)

Testicular sperm extraction (TESE).

Main Outcome Measurement(s)

We determined testicular SDF, and a basic comparison between nonobstructive (n = 22) and obstructive azoospermia (n = 40) was performed. We also correlated SDF with embryo quality and pregnancy outcome.

Result(s)

SDF in the testicular sperm of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia was significantly higher, 46.92% (SEM = 4.47), than that of patients with obstructive azoospermia, 35.96% (SEM = 2.63). A moderate relationship between embryo morphology and testicular SDF was detected. Logistic regression analysis of the effect of testicular SDF on pregnancy outcome revealed no significant effect (odds ratio = 1.015).

Conclusion(s)

Ours is the first report of SDF analysis in testicular sperm by using SCD in azoospermia. This result suggests that spermatogenesis failure may result in a severe affectation of sperm DNA integrity. The degree of DNA fragmentation using the SCD test is not reflected in pregnancy chances, and the explanation could be that embryos have been selected.

Key Words: Testicular sperm, DNA fragmentation, spermatogenesis, embryo quality, SCD test

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 M.M. has nothing to disclose. R.S. has nothing to disclose. N.G. has nothing to disclose. M.G.-S. has nothing to disclose. J.R. has nothing to disclose. J.L.F. has nothing to disclose.

 This work was presented in part at the 33rd meeting of the American Society of Andrology, Albuquerque, NM, April 2008.

 This work was supported by IMPIVA IMIDTF/2007/182 (Generalitat Valenciana) and Xunta de Galicia INCITE07PXI916201ES.

PII: S0015-0282(08)03727-8

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.106

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 92, Issue 5 , Pages 1638-1645, November 2009