Fertility and Sterility
Volume 92, Issue 6 , Pages 1862-1869, December 2009

The three-dimensional ultrasonographic ovarian vascularity of women developing poor ovarian response during assisted reproduction treatment and its predictive value

Nottingham University Research and Treatment Unit in Reproduction (NURTURE), Academic Division of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, School of Human Development, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom

Received 1 June 2008; received in revised form 8 September 2008; accepted 8 September 2008. published online 29 October 2008.

Objective

To test the hypothesis that ovarian vascularity is decreased in women who demonstrate poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation as part of assisted reproduction treatment.

Design

Prospective study.

Setting

University-based Assisted Conception Unit.

Patient(s)

One hundred forty-one women undergoing their first cycle of assisted reproduction treatment (ART).

Intervention(s)

Transvaginal 3D ultrasound assessment and venepuncture in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle immediately before ART.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Ovarian vascularity indices (VI, FI, and VFI), ovarian volume (OV), and antral follicle count (AFC).

Results

The ovarian VI (7.5 ± 5.3 vs. 8.6 ± 7.3), FI (38.9 ± 6.9 vs. 38.0 ± 5.5), and VFI (3.2 ± 2.6 vs. 3.5 ± 3.1) were similar in both poor and normal responders. AFC and OV were significantly lower in women who developed poor response (9 ± 3.3 and 6.3 ± 3.5 cm3, respectively) than in normal responders (19.2 ± 9.9 and 8.9 ± 4.8 cm3, respectively). Antral follicle count and basal FSH were the only significant predictors of poor ovarian response on multiple regression analysis.

Conclusion(s)

Ovarian blood flow, as measured by 3D ultrasound, is not decreased in women who demonstrate a poor response to ovarian stimulation and is not predictive of poor response during IVF treatment. The AFC is the single best predictor of poor ovarian response.

Key Words: In vitro fertilization, antral follicle count, three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound, poor ovarian response, ovarian blood flow, ovarian reserve

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 K.J. has nothing to disclose. H.A.-H. has nothing to disclose. R.J. has nothing to disclose. B.C. has nothing to disclose. J.H. has nothing to disclose. I.J. has nothing to disclose. N.R.-F. has nothing to disclose.

 This article has been presented orally at the 18th World Congress on Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago, Illinois, USA. August 24–28, 2008.

PII: S0015-0282(08)03929-0

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.031

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 92, Issue 6 , Pages 1862-1869, December 2009