Fertility and Sterility
Volume 92, Issue 6 , Pages 1862-1869 , December 2009

The three-dimensional ultrasonographic ovarian vascularity of women developing poor ovarian response during assisted reproduction treatment and its predictive value

Received 1 June 2008 ,Revised 8 September 2008 ,Accepted 8 September 2008.

References 

  1. Arslan M, Bocca S, Mirkin S, Barroso G, Stadtmauer L, Oehninger S. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization: two decades of experience after the birth of Elizabeth Carr. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:555–569
  2. Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12:685–718
  3. Templeton A, Morris JK, Parslow W. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Lancet. 1996;348:1402–1406
  4. Hanoch J, Lavy Y, Holzer H, Hurwitz A, Simon A, Revel A, et al. Young low responders protected from untoward effects of reduced ovarian response. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:1001–1004
  5. Keay SD, Liversedge NH, Mathur RS, Jenkins JM. Assisted conception following poor ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:521–527
  6. Broekmans FJ, Knauff EA, te Velde ER, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. Female reproductive ageing: current knowledge and future trends. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2007;18:58–65
  7. Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Bancsi LF, Te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ. Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:291–301
  8. Sladkevicius P, Valentin L, Marsal K. Blood flow velocity in the uterine and ovarian arteries during the normal menstrual cycle. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1993;3:199–208
  9. Zaidi J, Barber J, Kyei-Mensah A, Bekir J, Campbell S, Tan SL. Relationship of ovarian stromal blood flow at the baseline ultrasound scan to subsequent follicular response in an in vitro fertilization program. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:779–784
  10. Kupesic S, Kurjak A, Bjelos D, Vujisic S. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic ovarian measurements and in vitro fertilization outcome are related to age. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:190–197
  11. Pan HA, Cheng YC, Li CH, Wu MH, Chang FM. Ovarian stroma flow intensity decreases by age: a three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonographic study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28:425–430
  12. Engmann L, Sladkevicius P, Agrawal R, Bekir JS, Campbell S, Tan SL. Value of ovarian stromal blood flow velocity measurement after pituitary suppression in the prediction of ovarian responsiveness and outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:22–29
  13. Ng EH, Tang OS, Chan CC, Ho PC. Ovarian stromal blood flow in the prediction of ovarian response during in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:3147–3151
  14. Popovic-Todorovic B, Loft A, Lindhard A, Bangsboll S, Andersson AM, Andersen AN. A prospective study of predictive factors of ovarian response in “standard” IVF/ICSI patients treated with recombinant FSH. A suggestion for a recombinant FSH dosage normogram. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:781–787
  15. Jarvela IY, Sladkevicius P, Kelly S, Ojha K, Campbell S, Nargund G. Quantification of ovarian power Doppler signal with three-dimensional ultrasonography to predict response during in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:816–822
  16. Kupesic S, Kurjak A. Predictors of IVF outcome by three-dimensional ultrasound. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:950–955
  17. Merce LT, Barco MJ, Bau S, Troyano JM. Prediction of ovarian response and IVF/ICSI outcome by three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler angiography. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;132:93–100
  18. Ng EH, Tang OS, Chan CC, Ho PC. Ovarian stromal vascularity is not predictive of ovarian response and pregnancy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:43–49
  19. Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Kendall NR, Johnson IR. The reliability of virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) for the semiquantification of ovarian, endometrial and subendometrial perfusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:633–639
  20. Dickey RP. Doppler ultrasound investigation of uterine and ovarian blood flow in infertility and early pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update. 1997;3:467–503
  21. Rubin JM. Power doppler. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(Suppl 3):S318–S322
  22. Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Kendall NR, Johnson IR. The interobserver reliability of three-dimensional power Doppler data acquisition within the female pelvis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;23:501–508
  23. Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Eijkemans MJ, de Jong FH, Habbema JD, te Velde ER. Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:328–336
  24. Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BC, Johnson IR. The semi-quantification of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography of the endometrium: preliminary experience. Abstracts from the 33rd British Medical Ultrasound Society Annual Scientific Meeting, Edinburgh, UK, December 2001. Eur J Ultrasound. 2002;15(Suppl 1):S32
  25. Jayaprakasan K, Hilwah N, Kendall NR, Hopkisson JF, Campbell BK, Johnson IR, et al. Does 3D ultrasound offer any advantage in the pretreatment assessment of ovarian reserve and prediction of outcome after assisted reproduction treatment?. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1932–1941
  26. Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Johnson IR. The interobserver reliability of ovarian volume measurement is improved with three-dimensional ultrasound, but dependent upon technique. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29:1685–1690
  27. Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Kendall NR, Clewes JS, Johnson IR. Quantifying the changes in endometrial vascularity throughout the normal menstrual cycle with three-dimensional power Doppler angiography. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:330–338
  28. Lam PM, Johnson IR, Raine-Fenning NJ. Three-dimensional ultrasound features of the polycystic ovary and the effect of different phenotypic expressions on these parameters. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:3116–3123
  29. NICE . Fertility: assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. London: National collaborating centre for Women's and Children's Health for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. London: RCOG Press; 2004;33
  30. Raine-Fenning NJ, Ramnarine KV, Nordine NM, Campbell BC. Quantification of blood perfusion using 3D power Doppler: an in-vitro flow phantom study. J Phys (Conf. Series 1). 2004;181–186
  31. Jayaprakasan K, Campbell BK, Hopkisson JF, Clewes JS, Johnson IR, Raine-Fenning NJ. Effect of pituitary desensitization on the early growing follicular cohort estimated using anti-Mullerian hormone. Hum Reprod. 2008;
  32. Yu Ng EH, Chi Wai Chan C, Tang OS, Shu Biu Yeung W, Chung Ho P. Effect of pituitary downregulation on antral follicle count, ovarian volume and stromal blood flow measured by three-dimensional ultrasound with power Doppler prior to ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2811–2815
  33. Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Dorland M, Habbema JD, Looman CW, te Velde ER. Antral follicle counts by transvaginal ultrasonography are related to age in women with proven natural fertility. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:845–851
  34. Ng EH, Yeung WS, Fong DY, Ho PC. Effects of age on hormonal and ultrasound markers of ovarian reserve in Chinese women with proven fertility. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2169–2174
  35. Ng EH, Chan CC, Yeung WS, Ho PC. Effect of age on ovarian stromal flow measured by three-dimensional ultrasound with power Doppler in Chinese women with proven fertility. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2132–2137
  36. Moor RM, Seamark RF. Cell signaling, permeability, and microvasculatory changes during antral follicle development in mammals. J Dairy Sci. 1986;69:927–943
  37. Cran DG, Osborn JC, Rushton D. Thecal vasculature and oocyte maturation during follicular atresia in the sheep and pig. Reprod Nutr Dev. 1983;23:285–292
  38. Hay MF, Moor RM, Cran DG, Dott HM. Regeneration of atretic sheep ovarian follicles in vitro. J Reprod Fertil. 1979;55:195–207

 K.J. has nothing to disclose. H.A.-H. has nothing to disclose. R.J. has nothing to disclose. B.C. has nothing to disclose. J.H. has nothing to disclose. I.J. has nothing to disclose. N.R.-F. has nothing to disclose.

 This article has been presented orally at the 18th World Congress on Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago, Illinois, USA. August 24–28, 2008.

PII: S0015-0282(08)03929-0

doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.031

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 92, Issue 6 , Pages 1862-1869 , December 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution