Fertility and Sterility
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 783-788, February 2010

Post-biopsy bovine embryo viability and whole genome amplification in preimplantation genetic diagnosis

  • Juliana Polisseni, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Brazil
    • Centro de Biologia da Reprodução, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Juliana Polisseni, M.S., Rua Oscar Vidal 245/301, Centro Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil CEP:36016-290 (FAX: 55-32-3216-5092).
  • ,
  • Wanderlei Ferreira de Sá, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Brazil
  • ,
  • Martha de Oliveira Guerra, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Centro de Biologia da Reprodução, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil
  • ,
  • Marco Antônio Machado, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Brazil
  • ,
  • Raquel Varella Serapião, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Brazil
  • ,
  • Bruno Campos de Carvalho, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais, Epamig, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • ,
  • Luiz Sérgio de Almeida Camargo, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Brazil
  • ,
  • Vera Maria Peters, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Centro de Biologia da Reprodução, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil

Received 4 July 2008; received in revised form 6 October 2008; accepted 17 October 2008. published online 25 December 2008.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of the biopsy of 8-cell to 16-cell bovine embryos on their subsequent development and the effect of whole genome amplification (WGA) on removed blastomeres.

Design

Randomized study.

Setting

Molecular genetics and animal reproduction laboratories.

Patient(s)

Cow ovaries obtained from slaughterhouses.

Intervention(s)

The ovaries were punctured, and the oocytes were matured and fertilized in vitro. On the fourth day after fertilization, 8-cell to 16-cell bovine embryos were biopsied, one quarter of each embryo being removed. The blastomeres were submitted to WGA followed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The embryos were returned to culture for evaluation of their development.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Subsequent rate of blastocyst development, embryo cell number, WGA efficiency, and sex determination.

Result(s)

A total of 92 embryos were submitted to biopsy. The blastocyst production was 53.3%, with 44.9% of hatching rate. These results were similar to those of the control group (66.0% and 42.6%) of 103 embryos. Overall, no impact was detected on embryo quality in blastocyst cell number between the two groups. Removed blastomeres were submitted to WGA, resulting in 98.2% of efficiency. However, only 59% of the samples were sexed by PCR.

Conclusion(s)

Biopsy of 8-cell to 16-cell bovine embryos did not affect their subsequent development. WGA was successful in removed blastomeres.

Key Words: PGD, sexing, embryo quality, hatching rate

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 J.P. has nothing to disclose. W.F.de S. has nothing to disclose. M. de O.G. has nothing to disclose. M.A.M. has nothing to disclose. R.V.S. has nothing to disclose.

 B.C. de C. has nothing to disclose. L.S. de A.C. has nothing to disclose. V.M.P. has nothing to disclose.

 Supported by Fundação de Amparo à pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil Fapemig–Rede 2827/05); Centro Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil (CNPq/480.205/2004-3).

PII: S0015-0282(08)04281-7

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.023

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 783-788, February 2010