Fertility and Sterility
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 783-788 , February 2010

Post-biopsy bovine embryo viability and whole genome amplification in preimplantation genetic diagnosis

  • Juliana Polisseni, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Brazil
    • Centro de Biologia da Reprodução, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Juliana Polisseni, M.S., Rua Oscar Vidal 245/301, Centro Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil CEP:36016-290 (FAX: 55-32-3216-5092).
    • ,
  • Wanderlei Ferreira de Sá, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Brazil
    • ,
  • Martha de Oliveira Guerra, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Centro de Biologia da Reprodução, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil
    • ,
  • Marco Antônio Machado, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Brazil
    • ,
  • Raquel Varella Serapião, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Brazil
    • ,
  • Bruno Campos de Carvalho, M.S.

      Affiliations

    • Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais, Epamig, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
    • ,
  • Luiz Sérgio de Almeida Camargo, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Embrapa Gado de Leite, Brazil
    • ,
  • Vera Maria Peters, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Centro de Biologia da Reprodução, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil

Received 4 July 2008 ,Revised 6 October 2008 ,Accepted 17 October 2008.

References 

  1. Cohen J, Wells D, Munne S. Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:496–503
  2. Pehlivan T, Rubio C, Rodrigo L, Remohí J, Pellicer A, Simón C. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization: clinical possibilities and pitfalls. Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003;10:315–322
  3. Wilding M, Forman R, Hogewind G, Di Matteo L, Zullo F, Cappiello F, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for the treatment of failed in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer and habitual abortion. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1302–1307
  4. Jimenez-Macedo AR, Paramio MT, Anguita B, Morato R, Romaguerra R, Mogas T, et al. Effect of ICSI and embryo biopsy on embryo development and apoptosis according to oocyte diameter in prepubertal goats. Theriogenology. 2007;67:1399–1408
  5. Huges S, Arneson N, Done S, Squire J. The use of whole genome amplification in the study of human disease. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2005;88:173–189
  6. Hawk HW, Wall RJ. Improved yields of bovine blastocysts from in vitro–produced oocytes. I. Selection of oocytes and zygotes. Theriogenology. 1994;41:1571–1583
  7. Parrish J, Susko-Parrish J, Winer M, First N. Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biol Reprod. 1988;38:1171–1180
  8. Gordon I. Culturing the early embryo. In:  Gordon I editors. Laboratory production of cattle embryos. London: CAB International/Cambridge University Press; 1994;p. 227–292
  9. Moore K, Bondioli KR. Glycine and alanine supplementation of culture medium enhances development in vitro matured and fertilized cattle embryos. Biol Reprod. 1996;45:41–49
  10. Rosenkranks CF, First NL. Effect of free amino acids and vitamins on cleavage and developmental rate of bovine zygotes in vitro. J Anim Sci. 1994;72:434–437
  11. In:  Stringfellow DA,  Seidel SM editor. Manual of the International Embryo Transfer Society. 3rd ed.. Savoy, IL: IETS; 1998;
  12. Almodin CG, Moron AF, Kulay L, Kruger E, Pereira LAC, Minguetti-Câmara VC. Avaliação do desenvolvimento de embriões bovinos pós-biópsia: um modelo experimental. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 1999;21:533–538
  13. Park JH, Lee JH, Choi KM, Joung SY, Kim JY, Chung GM, et al. Rapid sexing of preimplantation bovine embryo using consecutive and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with biopsied single blastomere. Theriogenology. 2001;55:1843–1853
  14. Tominaga K, Hamada Y. Efficient production of sex-identified and cryosurvived bovine in-vitro produced blastocysts. Theriogenology. 2004;61:1181–1191
  15. Lopes RFF, Forell F, Oliveira ATD, Rodrigues JL. Splitting and biopsy for bovine embryo sexing under field conditions. Theriogenology. 2001;56:1383–1392
  16. Hardy K, Martin KL, Leese HJ, Winston RML, Handyside AH. Human preimplantation development in vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8-cell stage. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:708–714
  17. Zhang L, Cui X, Schmitt K, Hubert R, Navidi W, Arnheim N. Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5847–5851
  18. Almodin CG, Moron AF, Kulay L, Minguetti-Câmara VC, Moraes AC, Torloni MR. A bovine protocol for training professionals in preimplantation genetic diagnosis using polymerase chain reaction. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:895–899
  19. Schneider PM, Balogh K, Naveran N, Bogus M, Bender K, Lareu M, et al. Whole genome amplification—the solution for a common problem in forensic casework?. Prog Forensic Genet. 2004;10:24–26
  20. Ballantyne KN, van Oorschot RAH, Mitchell RJ. Comparison of two whole genome amplification methods for STR genotyping of LCN and degraded DNA samples. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;166:35–41
  21. Carvalho RV, Del Campo MR, Palasz AT, Plante Y, Mapletoft RJ. Survival rates and sex ratio of bovine IVF embryos frozen at different developmental stages on day 7. Theriogenology. 1996;45:489–498
  22. Kochhar HS, Kochhar KP, Basrur PK, King WA. Influence of the duration of gamete interaction on cleavage, growth rate and sex distribution of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003;77:33–49
  23. Alomar M, Tasiaux H, Remacle S, George F, Paul D, Donnay I. Kinetics of fertilization and development, and sex ratio of bovine embryos produced using the semen of different bulls. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008;107:48–61

 J.P. has nothing to disclose. W.F.de S. has nothing to disclose. M. de O.G. has nothing to disclose. M.A.M. has nothing to disclose. R.V.S. has nothing to disclose.

 B.C. de C. has nothing to disclose. L.S. de A.C. has nothing to disclose. V.M.P. has nothing to disclose.

 Supported by Fundação de Amparo à pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil Fapemig–Rede 2827/05); Centro Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil (CNPq/480.205/2004-3).

PII: S0015-0282(08)04281-7

doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.023

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 783-788 , February 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution