Semen quality in fertile men in relation to psychosocial stress
Objective
To examine the association between stressful life events and semen parameters.
Design
Cross-sectional analysis in a pregnancy cohort study.
Setting
Prenatal clinics in five U.S. cities.
Patient(s)
Fertile men (n = 744) in the Study for Future Families, a cohort study of pregnant women and their partners.
Intervention(s)
None.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Sperm concentration, percent motile, and percent normal morphology and classification above/below World Health Organization (WHO) cutoffs for semen quality.
Result(s)
After adjusting for confounders, men reporting 2+ recent stressful life events had an increased risk of being classified below WHO thresholds for “normal” defined by concentration, motility, and morphology criteria compared with men reporting <2 stressful life events (odds ratio [OR] = 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18, 3.61; OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.04, 2.29; OR = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.02, 3.66 for concentration, motility and morphology, respectively). Men experiencing 2+ stressful life events had lower sperm concentration (log scale, β = −0.25; 95% CI, −0.38, −0.11) and lower percent motile sperm (β = −1.95; 95% CI, −3.98, 0.07), but percent normal morphology was less affected.
Conclusion(s)
These results suggest that stressful life events may be associated with decreased semen quality in fertile men. The experience of psychosocial stress may be a modifiable factor in the development of idiopathic infertility.
Key Words: Sperm concentration, sperm motility, sperm morphology, semen quality, psychosocial stress, life events
To access this article, please choose from the options below
A.L.G. has nothing to disclose. F.L. has nothing to disclose. C.B. has nothing to disclose. E.Z.D. has nothing to disclose. D.G. has nothing to disclose. J.W.O. has nothing to disclose. J.B.R. has nothing to disclose. A.S. has nothing to disclose. C.W. has nothing to disclose. S.H.S. has nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by the National Institute of Health grant nos. R01-ES09916 to the University of Missouri from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS); MO1-RR00400 to the University of Minnesota General Clinical Research Center; and MO1-RR0425 to the Research and Education Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and the Cedars-Sinai Research Institute from the National Center for Research Resources.
PII: S0015-0282(08)04660-8
doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.018
© 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

