« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 93, Issue 2
, Pages 527-536
, 15 January 2010
Direct health services costs of providing assisted reproduction services in older women
References
- . The variability of female reproductive ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8:141–154
- . Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilization treatment. Lancet. 1996;348:1402–1406
- Fertility and ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:261–276
- . Delayed childbearing and its impact on population rate changes in lower birth weight, multiple birth, and preterm delivery. Pediatrics. 2002;109:399–403
- . Can obstetric complications explain the high levels of obstetric interventions and maternity service use among older women? A retrospective analysis of routinely collected data. BJOG. 2001;108:910–918
- . Rates of Down syndrome at live birth by one-year maternal age intervals in studies with apparent close to complete ascertainment in populations of European origin: a proposed revised rate schedule for use in genetic and prenatal screening. Am J Med Genet. 1996;62:376–385
- . Delayed childbearing and maternal mortality. Euro J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;114:19–22
- . Long-term health consequences of delayed childbirth: NHANES III. Womens Health Issues. 2002;12:37–45
- Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:983–990
- . The cost of infertility diagnosis and treatment in Canada in 1995. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:951–958
- . Cost-effectiveness of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:748–754
- . Evaluation of the relative cost-effectiveness of treatments for infertility in UK. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:95–106
- . A detailed cost analysis of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:331–341
- National Institute of Clinical Excellence Fertility—assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems. Clinical Guideline no. 11, NICE UK. London: National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health; 2004;
- . Assisted reproductive-technology treatment costs of a live-birth: an age stratified cost-outcome study of treatment in Australia. Med J Aust. 2006;184:155–18
- . The incidence of severe complications of pre-eclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2005;24:181–190
- . Effect of female age on the diagnostic categories of infertility. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:538–542
- . Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary down regulation in assisted reproductive treatment (protocol). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):
- . Prevention and management of ovarian hyperstimulauion syndrome. Currt Obstet Gynecol. 2005;15:132–138
- . Thinking outside the box: recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:377–401
- . The cost effectiveness of IVF in the UK: A comparison of three gonadotrophin treatments. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2557–2562
- Cost effectiveness modelling of recombinanat FSH versus urinary FSH in assisted reproduction techniques in the UK. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2563–2569
- . Cumulative live-birth rates after in-vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:236–243
- Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:756–771
- . Cost-effectiveness of IVF in women 38 years and older. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2000;69:143–148
- . The costs to the NHS of multiple births after IVF treatment in the UK. BJOG. 2006;113:21–25
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of different embryo transfer strtegies in England. BJOG. 2008;115:758–766
- . The impact of an assisted conception unit on the workload of a general gynaecology unit. BJOG. 2002;109:207–211
- . Systematic review of economic aspects of alternative modes of delivery. BJOG. 2001;108:149–157
- Economic implications of assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3090–3109
- . A survey of clinicians' views on the effect of age on access to in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and the use of tests of ovarian reserve prior to IVF in the United Kingdom. Hum Fertil. 2008;11:23–27
A.M. has nothing to disclose. G.S. has nothing to disclose. J.B. has nothing to disclose. A.M. has nothing to disclose. M.H. has nothing to disclose. S.B. has nothing to disclose.
Supported by National Health Service Endownment (07/63) and the University of Aberdeen.
PII: S0015-0282(09)00238-6
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.115
© 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 93, Issue 2
, Pages 527-536
, 15 January 2010

