Journal Home
Search for

Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 510-516 (15 January 2010)


View previous. 30 of 56 View next.

Impact of oocyte cryopreservation on embryo development

M. Cristina Magli, M.Sc., Michela Lappi, B.Sc., Anna P. Ferraretti, M.D., Alessandra Capoti, B.Sc., Alessandra Ruberti, B.Sc., Luca Gianaroli, M.D.Corresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 22 November 2008; received in revised form 16 January 2009; accepted 27 January 2009. published online 01 April 2009.

Objective

To verify whether the morphologic evaluation of zygotes and embryos derived from thawed oocytes could provide some relevant information regarding their developmental performance.

Design

Fertilization, zygote, and embryo morphology from sibling fresh and frozen oocytes was compared.

Setting

Reproductive Medicine Unit, Società Italiana Studi Medicina della Riproduzione, Bologna, Italy.

Patient(s)

Two hundred thirty-four patients underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles from which 1,101 spare metaphase II oocytes were cryopreserved. Subsequently, 256 thawing cycles were performed, and 997 oocytes were thawed.

Intervention(s)

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection was performed on both fresh and frozen oocytes.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Fertilization rates, pronuclear zygote morphology, and embryo cleavage rates.

Result(s)

Thawed oocytes had lower chances of being fertilized and developing into top-quality zygotes and regularly cleaving embryos when compared with sibling fresh oocytes irrespective of female age. As a result, the percentage of transferred cycles was significantly lower in frozen cycles compared with fresh cycles (79% and 93%, respectively); the proportion of transferred top-quality embryos followed the same trend.

Conclusion(s)

Reduced fertilization and cleavage rates in frozen cycles when compared with sibling fresh oocytes suggest that, even if surviving thawing, the process of slow freezing has a negative impact on the potential of further growth that is evident as early as the first cleavage divisions.

Reproductive Medicine Unit, Società Italiana Studi Medicina della Riproduzione, Bologna, Italy

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Luca Gianaroli, M.D., S.I.S.M.E.R., Via Mazzini, 12, 40138 Bologna, Italy (FAX: 39-051-302933).

 M.C.M. has nothing to disclose. M.L. has nothing to disclose. A.P.F. has nothing to disclose. A.C. has nothing to disclose. A.R. has nothing to disclose. L.G. has nothing to disclose.

PII: S0015-0282(09)00272-6

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.148


View previous. 30 of 56 View next.